arXiv AI

Neurosymbolic Learning for Inference-Time Argumentation

arXiv:2605. 20098v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Claim verification is an important problem in high-stakes settings, including health and finance.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

OBJECTION! Lawyer Agents Mitigate Guilty Bias in Legal Judgment Prediction

The paper introduces OBJECTION, an inference-time pipeline that adds an Adversarial Lawyer Agent to each of the three reasoning steps—offense, unlawfulness, and culpability—in legal judgment prediction models. By actively injecting defense arguments, the agent challenges the model’s default assumption of guilt, which is common in datasets biased toward guilty outcomes. Using a new Natural Innocent dataset of 3.4k real cases, OBJECTION reduces the False Guilty Rate from 82.93% to 16.69%, demonstrating significant improvement in substantive legal reasoning.

By Jaehoon Jeong, Jay-Yoon Lee
arXiv AI
Jun 9

TRIAGE: Dialectical Reasoning for Explainable Risk Prediction on Irregularly Sampled Medical Time Series with LLMs

arXiv:2606. 09030v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clinical early warning systems built on electronic health records, in which clinical observations are recorded as irregularly sampled medical time series (ISMTS), must deliver both calibrated risk scores for patient triage and interpretable rationales that clinicians can verify.

By Hyeongwon Jang, Gyouk Chu, Changhun Kim, Joonhyung Park, Hangyul Yoon, Eunho Yang
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Contrastive Explanations in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

The paper introduces contrastive explanations for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs), a formalism used to represent and reason with information. Unlike traditional explanations that focus on a single argument, contrastive explanations highlight the differences between two topic arguments. The authors propose a general form of contrastive attribution functions (CAFs), present CAFs based on removal, gradients, and Shapley-values, and demonstrate their applicability in healthcare and bias identification contexts.

By Xiang Yin, Nico Potyka, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
arXiv AI
3d ago

Reasoning Externalization for Faithful Large Language Model Narratives of Stock Return Predictions

The paper introduces a framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to generate natural‑language narratives explaining cross‑sectional stock return predictions. It combines temporal Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) from an XGBoost model with historical regime analogs to provide context. A controlled study shows that progressively externalizing numerical and relational reasoning improves evidence faithfulness and accuracy, while historical analogs boost human‑rated usefulness.

By Sujung Kim, Seung Hwan Cho, Sangjin Park, Young-Min Kim
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 5

Forethought: Verifiable Reasoning from Neurosymbolic Primitive Programming

Current agentic workflows usually involve decomposing user requests into sequences of tool calls with correctly resolved parameters, the results of which are processed through reasoning traces in the language model's context window. The prevailing route to improve such reasoning is test-time scaling, which trains models to search over long chains of thought; but the resulting capability is entangled in model weights, is not verifiable step-by-step, and is costly at inference.