arXiv:2610.17659v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents have shown strong capabilities in interactive problem solving, tool use, and long-horizon task execution. However, th...
By Junkai Lin, Ge Xu, Zheng Xu, Junkai Chen, Xiangyuan Lan
arXiv:2603.18272v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, robust generalization to unseen tasks remains challengi...
By Thomas Palmeira Ferraz, Romain Deffayet, Vassilina Nikoulina, Herv\'e D\'ejean, St\'ephane Clinchant
The paper introduces Boundary-Aware Skill Memory (BASM), a method that enriches skill memories for large language model agents with explicit boundary fields such as applicability conditions, risk cues, avoidance rules, and recovery notes. This approach transforms retrieved skills from unconditional templates into state‑conditioned guidance, preventing the Skill Imitation Trap where more skills lead to incorrect tool usage. Experiments on three agent benchmarks and four model scales show that BASM improves task success rates, accuracy, and reduces attack success while cutting average steps compared to memory‑free baselines.
By Zihan Lin, Zhenyu Chen, Jiawen Wei, Xiaohan Wang, Jie Cao, Jiajun Chai, Wei Lin, Guojun Yin, Ran He
arXiv:2507. 05257v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks.
By Yuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, Julian McAuley
The paper introduces Propose-Then-Project Unlearning (PTP-U), a method for large language model unlearning that first weakens target knowledge associations and then projects non-target outputs back to the original distribution to recover capabilities. PTP-U aims to satisfy forgetting constraints while preserving fluent generation and performance on non-target tasks. Experiments on three benchmarks show PTP-U achieves a strong forgetting‑retention trade‑off, with 81.22%–91.03% forgetting and an average of 94.20% non‑target utility.
By Xunlei Chen, Qinghui Gong, Jingkun Xue, Qihe Liu, Shijie Zhou, Fei Ye
arXiv:2608.01008v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can memorize and disclose sensitive information, motivating machine unlearning to remove designated knowle...
By Junkai Lin, Junkai Chen, Siqi Hou, Yuhao He, Ruiqi Liu, Chenhan Jin, Shengze Xu, Tieyong Zeng, Xiangyuan Lan
arXiv:2606. 06320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model while preserving its general capabilities.
By Gizem Y\"uce, Giorgos Nikolaou, Nicolas Flammarion
arXiv:2610.17726v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents excel at complex, multi-step tasks but suffer from catastrophic forgetting during continual learning--acquiring new...
By Yuqian Fu, Kaiwen Jiang, Zijun Song, Jiawei Wang, Yuanheng Zhu, Dongbin Zhao
arXiv:2606. 06787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise as tool-using agents but remain limited in long-horizon tasks that require remembering, organizing, and reusing knowledge.
By Runzhe Wang, Huilin Lu, Shengjie Liu, Li Dong, Jason Zhu
arXiv:2607. 09236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning in LLMs is the targeted removal of specific knowledge while preserving all other capabilities, critical for privacy and safety.
By Amit Peleg, Naman Deep Singh, Naama Pearl, Bibhabasu Mohapatra, Matthias Hein
arXiv:2609.37076v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models trained on vast corpora inherently risk memorizing harmful content that may later re-emerge in their outputs. To mitigate this is...
By Puning Yang, Qizhou Wang, Junchi Yu, Bo Han, Xiuying Chen
MemCut introduces a benchmark to test user-requested forgetting in large language model agents, featuring 456 hand-designed secrets embedded in long-horizon conversations with fully annotated evidence trails. The benchmark defines two recovery metrics—native and residual—to assess how well secrets can be retrieved after deletion. Experiments across five memory designs and four LLMs show that deletion reduces native recovery more than residual recovery, highlighting candidate coverage as a key bottleneck.
By Cheng Zhang, Xuanning Cao, Zhicheng Zheng, Hui Xiong