arXiv:2610.01408v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Trajectory crossing remains a critical bottleneck in Flow Matching (FM), and previous works typically view these crossings from a theoretical optimizat...
By Ziqi Jiang, Zhenqi He, Long Chen
The paper introduces Flow Divergence Sampler (FDS), a training‑free method that refines intermediate states in flow‑matching models by using the divergence of the marginal velocity field to detect and correct misguidance toward low‑density regions. FDS operates during inference, requires no additional training, and can be applied as a plug‑and‑play module with standard solvers and existing flow backbones. Experiments show that FDS consistently improves fidelity in tasks such as text‑to‑image synthesis and inverse problems.
By Yeonwoo Cha, Jaehoon Yoo, Semin Kim, Yunseo Park, Jinhyeon Kwon, Seunghoon Hong
arXiv:2607. 12171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising.
By Xu Han, Jiajing Hu, Li-Ping Liu
In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising. Although prior work shows that these parameterizations lead to different empirical behaviors, the mechanisms underlying their respective advantages remain to be underexplored, and how to combine them effectively is still unclear.
The paper introduces the Variational Incompressible Optimal Transport (VIOT) operator, a generative neural operator that predicts divergence‑free velocity fields for incompressible density transport. VIOT combines a stream‑function representation, a regularized transport objective, and a Fourier Neural Operator backbone to amortize the solve across new source‑target pairs and grid resolutions. Experiments on 2D and 3D benchmarks show that VIOT produces full transport trajectories in seconds, achieving roughly a $10^4 imes$ speedup over per‑instance baselines that require hours of optimization.
By Jinjin He, Shenyifan Lu, Sinan Wang, Zhiqi Li, Duowen Chen, Bo Zhu
arXiv:2510.15038v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Flow-based Generative Models (FGMs) effectively transform noise into complex data distributions. Incorporating Optimal Transport (OT) to coup...
By Lingkai Kong, Molei Tao, Yang Liu, Bryan Wang, Jinmiao Fu, Chien-Chih Wang, Huidong Liu
The paper introduces COFM, a framework for consistent optimal transport flow matching that uses partially input convex neural networks (PICNN) to parameterize the transport potential. By adding a Hamilton‑Jacobi residual to the training objective, COFM enforces dynamical consistency and supports both one‑step transport and multi‑step ODE sampling without costly inner optimization. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that COFM achieves competitive performance while reducing L^2‑UVP by over 2× and cutting computational time by about 9× compared to state‑of‑the‑art models.
By Fanghui Song, Zhongjian Wang, Jiebao Sun
arXiv:2606. 04092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow matching models learn to transport samples from a simple prior distribution to a complex data distribution.
By Shimon Malnick, Matan Rusanovsky, Ohad Fried, Shai Avidan
arXiv:2610.00785v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Flow matching (FM) learns generative transport by fitting continuous-time motion from a simple source distribution to the data distribution. Most exist...
By Haoyang Jiang, Yuheng Li, Di Yang, Yanhai Xiong, Haipeng Chen, Yi He
The paper investigates the training dynamics of flow map models, which convert diffusion trajectories into one‑step samplers for efficient probabilistic generation. It provides a theoretical analysis of the functional gradient flow induced by MeanFlow and Lagrangian losses, proving their convergence to the true flow map and identifying the risk of unbounded updates. The authors show that adaptive normalization and a specific reweighting scheme not only bound updates but also guarantee convergence to a neighborhood of the solution, and they confirm these findings with synthetic experiments and image‑generation benchmarks.
By Ishan Nath, Tom Stanic, Avishek Joey Bose, Gauthier Gidel, Quentin Bertrand
arXiv:2601. 22495v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Fine-tuning flow matching models is a central challenge in settings with limited data, evolving distributions, or computational constraints.
By Gudrun Thorkelsdottir, Arindam Banerjee
We study path-flow alignment as a unified training objective for flow matching. Instead of fixing the interpolation path and learning only the velocity field, we jointly train an endpoint-preserving p...