arXiv:2609.24215v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Although text-to-image models can accurately depict subjects and scenes, creators still struggle to specify the fine-grained emotions an image should c...
By Minglang Li, Yueyue Fang, Xieping Gao
arXiv:2505.24427v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Accurate modeling of subjective phenomena such as emotion expression requires data annotated with authors' intentions. Commonly such data is collec...
By Christopher Bagdon, Aidan Combs, Carina Silberer, Roman Klinger
arXiv:2606. 05816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: T2I models cannot effectively capture sentiment from various types of text, including diaries, as they primarily focus on visual object-related patterns rather than contextual emotional understanding.
By Jihun Cho, Soo-Yeon Jeong, Sun-Young Ihm
The paper introduces CLEAR, a framework for Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation that couples contextual representations with local discriminative cues. It replaces emotion label generation with continuous internal representations from a vision‑language model and trains a classifier on these representations. Sample‑adaptive residual coupling is used to integrate textual and acoustic evidence from the target utterance into the contextual representation, improving emotion recognition performance on IEMOCAP and MELD datasets.
By Linan Zhu, Zihao Zhai, Mengfei Xu, Xiao Han, Yuqian Fu, Xiangfan Chen, Zihang Zhang
arXiv:2609.26907v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Memes often derive their harmful, hateful, or sarcastic meaning from small but decisive visual, textual, or cross-modal cues. Existing multimodal cla...
By Akshit Sharma, Prashant W. Patil
arXiv:2602. 16161v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Emotional expression underpins natural communication and effective human-computer interaction.
By Rong Fu, Ziming Wang, Shuo Yin, Haiyun Wei, Kun Liu, Xianda Li, Simon Fong
Cross-Modal Emotion Understanding: A Transformer-GAT Approach for Dialogue Emotion Recognition proposes a hybrid framework that combines a Transformer and a Graph Attention Network to capture both global semantic information and fine-grained relationships between modalities. The model is evaluated on the IEMOCAP and MELD datasets, achieving weighted F1 scores of 72.45% and 77.37%, respectively, and surpasses state‑of‑the‑art methods. These results suggest that integrating multimodal features with balanced global and local context modeling can provide deeper emotional insights for dialogue emotion recognition.
By Jiaqi Qiao, Yifan Lyu, Xiujuan Xu
arXiv:2607. 14769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing text summarization research has focused much on monologic information (e.
By Linyun Xiang, Mark Neerincx, Stephanie Tan
arXiv:2609.06188v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal sentiment analysis and emotion recognition in conversations demand effective modeling of heterogeneous interactions across textual, acoustic...
By Pengfei Shao, Jisheng Dang, Jiawen Fang, Ning Liu, Wencan Zhang, Bimei Wang, Jingwen Zhao, Jianhuang Lai, Qi Tian, Tat-Seng Chua
arXiv:2609.36563v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Visual emotion recognition commonly assumes that all evidence required for prediction is contained in the observed image or video. Yet the same visible...
By Yihao Qian, Runhao Zeng, Sicheng Zhao, Feng Liang, Hongmin Cai, Mingkui Tan
The paper compares text‑based and feature‑based models for recognizing compound emotions in real‑world videos. It proposes textualizing non‑verbal cues from audio and visual modalities into text to leverage large language models, while feature‑based models directly combine extracted multimodal features. Experiments on the C‑EXPR‑DB dataset show that feature‑based models outperform textualization in the wild, though textual models can excel when rich transcripts are available.
By Nicolas Richet, Soufiane Belharbi, Haseeb Aslam, Meike Emilie Schadt, Manuela Gonz\'alez-Gonz\'alez, Gustave Cortal, Alessandro Lameiras Koerich, Marco Pedersoli, Alain Finkel, Simon Bacon, Eric Granger
The paper introduces TIC‑Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models on deeply interleaved text‑image contexts. It covers logical, temporal, and spatial association tasks, totaling 2,280 questions across eight specific types. The authors benchmarked ten state‑of‑the‑art MLLMs, finding a significant performance gap versus human experts and highlighting persistent challenges in integrating evidence across interleaved visual and textual inputs.
By Zihao Wang, Xi Xiang, Yuwen Sun, Yingyu Li, Yabo Zhang, Yihan Zeng, Fan Li, Wangmeng Zuo