arXiv:2512. 01317v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Measurement-induced entanglement (MIE) captures how local measurements generate long-range quantum correlations and drive dynamical phase transitions in many-body systems.
By Dongheng Qian, Jing Wang
arXiv:2608. 11911v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A central promise of useful quantum advantage is the ability to compute ground states of Hamiltonian systems beyond the reach of classical simulation methods.
By Timothy Heightman, Elena Orlova, Philip Mantrov, Aleksei Ustimenko
arXiv:2607. 06472v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations?
By Rahul Bandyopadhyay, Riccardo Molteni, Jens Eisert, Vedran Dunjko, Sofiene Jerbi
Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations? We address this problem by studying the learnability of quantum many-body dynamics from the perspective of probably approximately correct (PAC)-learning.
arXiv:2308. 11290v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding the dynamics of large quantum systems is hindered by the curse of dimensionality.
By Yuxuan Du, Yibo Yang, Tongliang Liu, Zhouchen Lin, Bernard Ghanem, Dacheng Tao
arXiv:2607. 10656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Characterizing quantum topological phases requires measuring non-local string order parameters, demanding access to the full system, which is often experimentally unfeasible.
By Mehran Khosrojerdi, Sougato Bose, Alessandro Cuccoli, Paola Verrucchi, Abolfazl Bayat, Leonardo Banchi
arXiv:2607. 00365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum information (QI) are rapidly co-evolving.
By Min Chen, Yu Gan, Xin Jin, Yuqing Li, Junqi Wang, Zeguan Wu, Yunfei Wang, Bingzhi Zhang, Priyam Srivastava, Tianlong Chen, Ankit Kulshrestha, Yuan Liu, Juan Jos\'e Mendoza-Arenas, Kaushik P. Seshadreesan, Sarvagya Upadhyay, Xueyue Zhang, Quntao Zhuang, Junyu Liu
arXiv:2508. 19437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The importance of analyzing nontrivial datasets when testing quantum machine learning (QML) models is becoming increasingly prominent in literature, yet a cohesive framework for understanding dataset characteristics remains elusive.
By Alona Sakhnenko, Christian B. Mendl, Jeanette M. Lorenz
arXiv:2607. 05000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Canonical quantization provides a systematic procedure for constructing quantum models from classical Hamiltonians.
By Alexander He, Nana Liu, Mark M. Wilde
Neural quantum states (NQS) provide a flexible and scalable framework for approximating quantum many-body wavefunctions. Among NQS parameterizations, autoregressive models are especially attractive because they enable exact, independent sampling from the Born distribution, avoiding the autocorrelation and mixing issues of Markov chain methods.
arXiv:2607. 22516v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A central design principle in modern machine learning and artificial intelligence is to align a model's inductive bias with the structure of its input data.
By Peiyong Wang, Udaya Parampalli, Casey R. Myers
arXiv:2606. 19486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Characterizing the features of a Hamiltonian that governs a quantum system serves as a fundamental subroutine of quantum device calibration, signal sensing, and error correction.
By Taiqi Zhou, Weiyuan Gong