arXiv Machine Learning

Analytical Evaluation of DCA Convergence Properties for Minimizing Prediction Functions of Gaussian RBF Support Vector Regression

arXiv:2606. 03559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For nonconvex optimization problems whose objective is the prediction function of a trained Support Vector Regression (SVR) model with the Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel (RBF-SVR), we present a framework that applies the difference of convex functions (DC) algorithm (DCA) by exploiting the analytical structure of the RBF kernel to construct an explicit DC decomposition.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Riemannian ascent--descent for nonconvex nonconcave minimax landscapes: convergence to basin saddle points and applications to distributionally robust optimization

The paper introduces a new convergence framework for solving distributionally robust optimization problems formulated as nonconvex, nonconcave minimax problems over a Euclidean space and a Riemannian manifold. It defines a "basin saddle point"—a locally defined Nash equilibrium—and proves that a Riemannian gradient ascent–descent algorithm converges to such points under a local Łojasiewicz growth condition. The authors apply this theory to a statistical risk DRO problem over Gaussian measures, deriving explicit convergence rates and constants in terms of data dimension, loss moments, and reference covariance.

By Rishabh Dixit, Pranav Upadrashta, Alex Cloninger
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

A Closed-Form Formula for Consistent Lipschitz Regression on Metric Spaces with Sparse Neural Network Realizations

arXiv:2609. 03129v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Several classical machine-learning methods, such as KRRs and SVRs, are both computationally and analytically tractable since their estimators either admit closed-form expressions or are obtained by minimizing convex training objectives; neither feature is generally available for deep neural networks.

By Ruiyang Hong, Hrad Ghoukasian, Anastasis Kratsios
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

On the Implicit Flatness Bias of Sharpness-Aware Minimization: A Linear Stability Analysis with Quantitative Hyperparameter Bounds

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) improves generalization by seeking parameters whose loss is robust to local adversarial perturbations, but the quantitative mechanism underlying its implicit bias toward flat minima remains unclear. In particular, the perturbation radius $ρ$ is typically treated as an isolated tuning parameter, despite defining the neighborhood in which SAM measures sharpness.

arXiv Statistics ML
3d ago

Optimal VC Dimension of Contrastive Learning with Margin

arXiv:2609.38834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contrastive learning is a successful paradigm for learning $d$-dimensional geometric representations from a collection of ``anchor--positive--negativ...

By Dionysis Arvanitakis, Vaggos Chatziafratis, Yiyuan Luo, Konstantin Makarychev