arXiv Machine Learning

MLT-Dedup: Efficient Large-Scale Online Video Deduplication via Multi-Level Representations and Spatial-Temporal Matching

arXiv:2606. 12215v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The explosive growth of user-generated video content on online platforms is accompanied by the emergence of numerous near-duplicate videos--videos that are identical or highly similar but differ by partial edits.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

MLT-Dedup: Efficient Large-Scale Online Video Deduplication via Multi-Level Representations and Spatial-Temporal Matching

The explosive growth of user-generated video content on online platforms is accompanied by the emergence of numerous near-duplicate videos--videos that are identical or highly similar but differ by partial edits. These duplicates degrade user experience and increase storage and bandwidth costs, making large-scale video deduplication a critical task.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Allocate Before You Embed: Adaptive Visual Input Allocation for Video Embeddings

The paper introduces AllocEmbed, an allocate‑then‑embed framework that reallocates a fixed visual‑input budget across more video frames to improve retrieval performance. A lightweight allocator uses low‑cost previews to assign frame‑wise resolutions before the embedding backbone, preserving detail where it most benefits retrieval while reducing visual cost elsewhere. Retrieval‑Driven Policy Optimization (RDPO) learns the allocator directly from retrieval feedback, and the method integrates with existing systems without modifying the embedding model.

By Song Jin, Zhongtao Jiang, Chenglei Shen, Huanxuan Liao, Haozhe Chi, Zhiwei Wang, Kun Xu, Yong Liu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

TAME: Temporal-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for Text-Video Retrieval

TAME is a CLIP‑based framework for Text‑Video Retrieval that incorporates temporal modeling through three key innovations: sparse Mixture‑of‑Experts layers with frame‑consistent routing, Frame‑Temporal tokens that aggregate cross‑frame information, and a Cross‑Temporal Interaction and Aggregation module for refining frame‑wise similarities. These components enable the model to capture both local visual patterns and long‑range temporal dependencies, leading to consistent performance gains over CLIP‑based baselines on multiple TVR benchmarks, including a 4.0 R@1 improvement on MSR‑VTT. The code is publicly available on GitHub.

By Uicheol Jung, Juyoung Hong, Hojung Kwon, Yukyung Choi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

TAME: Temporal-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for Text-Video Retrieval

TAME introduces a Temporal-Aware Mixture-of-Experts framework for Text-Video Retrieval that enhances CLIP-based models by incorporating frame-level structure and temporal relations. It adds sparse Mixture-of-Experts layers with frame-consistent routing, Frame-Temporal tokens for global cross-frame aggregation, and a Cross-Temporal Interaction and Aggregation module to refine sentence-video similarities. Experiments on multiple TVR benchmarks show consistent performance gains, such as a 4.0 R@1 improvement on MSR‑VTT over CLIP4Clip.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

MARS: What Retrieval Signals Are Hidden in Multimodal Large Language Models for Text-Video Retrieval?

MARS introduces a multi‑layer, multi‑slot embedding framework for text‑video retrieval that constructs adaptive representation slots by combining hidden states from different decoder layers. By comparing corresponding text and video slots and aggregating their similarities, MARS captures fine‑grained cues that single‑token embeddings miss. A hard‑negative‑aware slot specialization objective further encourages slots to focus on discriminative matching cues, leading to state‑of‑the‑art results on four benchmarks.

By Uicheol Jung, Juyoung Hong, Geuntaek Lim, Yukyung Choi
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

VEDJE: Video-Efficient Discriminative Joint Encoder for Scalable Video-Text Retrieval

VEDJE is a new video-text retrieval method that compresses video features into a reusable cache while keeping them distinct for each frame. It introduces feature-change prediction as an auxiliary training signal, enabling improved retrieval from the compressed cache without extra cost at query time. Experiments on MSR-VTT, MSVD, DiDeMo, and ActivityNet show that VEDJE boosts R@1 in both retrieval directions, achieving 59.8% text-to-video R@1 on MSR-VTT with a fine-tuned VideoCLIP-XL first stage and maintaining recall when the per-video cache is reduced to 12 KiB.

By Shahaf Wagner, Gabriele Serussi, Dan Ben Ami, Tomer Galanti, Chaim Baskin
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

LDDR: Linear-DPP Dynamic-Resolution Frame Sampling for Video MLLMs

LDDR (Linear DPP Dynamic Resolution) is a training‑free, budget‑aware video frame sampling framework designed for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). It uses query‑aware Determinantal Point Process (DPP) selection in a task‑conditioned feature space, achieving a 3× runtime speedup over standard DPP baselines. By assigning a non‑uniform token budget—allocating more tokens to informative, non‑redundant frames and downscaling or pruning less useful ones—LDDR improves performance by 2.5 points in low‑budget settings and 1.6 points in high‑budget scenarios across four video benchmarks and multiple MLLM families.

By Jingfeng Chen, Jiawen Qian, Wendi Deng, Yinuo Guo, Jiaqi Yu, Sicong Leng, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Bhuwan Dhingra
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Intrinsic Temporal Adaptation of CLIP for Partially Relevant Video Retrieval

The paper introduces Intrinsic Temporal Adaptation (ITA) for Partially Relevant Video Retrieval (PRVR), a task that seeks untrimmed videos containing moments relevant to a text query. ITA employs a Backbone-Internal Temporal Adaptation that lets the final visual transformer layers attend to neighboring frames, creating temporally aware embeddings while keeping CLIP frozen. Additionally, an Affinity-Weighted Gradient Propagation technique softly aggregates top‑k frames based on text‑frame affinities to better handle the weakly supervised nature of PRVR, leading to state‑of‑the‑art performance and more accurate frame‑level evidence retrieval.

By Hyun Seok Seong, Woojin Jun, SuBeen Lee, Jae-Pil Heo