Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6b] - The five field families the parser reads straight from the user’s question, with the code that fills each one The post What the Question Parser Extracts from a User String: Keywords, Scope, Shape, Decomposition, Clarification appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6quater] - Question parsing takes one messy string and writes four typed pieces, each read by a different downstream call The post Context Engineering for RAG Question Parsing: From a Raw Question to Typed Fields That Steer Retrieval and Generation appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6ter] - Six positions on the question-parsing brick that contradict the mainstream RAG playbook The post The Untaught Lessons of RAG Question Parsing: Structure Before You Search appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6a] - Why a user question deserves the same parsing as the document, and how it splits into a retrieval brief and a generation brief before either runs The post RAG Questions Need Parsing Too: Turn the User’s String Into Briefs for Retrieval and Generation appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6quinquies] - Prompt engineering, then context engineering, then loop engineering.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6c] - The decisions the parser makes on top of the user string, using the document’s profile: dispatch, activations, full schema, three approaches to deciding what fires, the audit _meta block, and a broker-corpus walkthrough The post Dispatching the Parsed RAG Question: Chunk Strategy, Model Tier, Activations, Audit appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #8B] - A fixed BASE, the rules each question needs, one registry: the dispatcher that turns a parsed question into a typed LLM call The post Assemble Each RAG Generation Prompt from a Base Prompt Plus the Rules Each Question Needs appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article discusses how an FAQ can invert the traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline. It explains that parsing becomes trivial, retrieval functions as a cache, and few‑shot prompting is reframed as a retrieval problem. The piece highlights the practical implications of designing a corpus around an FAQ structure for enterprise document intelligence.
The article explains that enterprise document intelligence can be categorized into three distinct corpus types, each requiring a specific architecture. It outlines how to determine the shape of a document collection through three key questions. The piece also discusses the costs associated with building a system for the incorrect corpus type.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #5nonies] - Nature, plan, execute, synthesize: closing brick 1 with a dispatcher that reads each PDF’s nature and picks the method that fits, fitz, Docling, PaddleOCR, EasyOCR, MinerU or Surya, then folds the outputs into one corpus The post Before Full Agentic RAG: Know How You Decide, and the Parsing Methods You Pick From appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #8A] - The schema is the contract: every field is a question the pipeline asks the model, and every answer is checkable The post Stop Returning Text from RAG: The Typed Answer Contract That Prevents Hallucination appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #12] - The category of question most RAG pipelines silently fail on, and the pipeline shape that handles them The post Loop Engineering for Listing Questions: When the Answer Is Every Passage, Not the Top One appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #7A] - Stop searching strings.