arXiv Machine Learning

Online Dynamic Batching with Formal Guarantees for LLM Training

arXiv:2606. 19989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern LLM training breaks a core assumption behind offline batch samplers: the true training cost of a sample is only observable after preprocessing, augmentation, templating, tokenization, and multimodal visual-token expansion.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

Cacheable by Design? Training Mixture-of-Experts Routers for Locality Against the Edge Memory-Bandwidth Wall: A Pre-Registered Negative Result with a Systems Measurement Study

The paper investigates whether training Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) routers can improve memory‑bandwidth locality on consumer GPUs. Using a new zero‑surgery telemetry tool, the authors measure that a large Qwen3‑235B model is bottlenecked by disk‑based expert access, and that an LRU cache can serve a majority of requests. They pre‑register experiments training 137 M‑parameter MoE models with locality‑aware losses, finding that while cache misses can drop up to 60 % (99 % static‑pin hit rate), every configuration fails to meet a strict 1 % perplexity threshold, indicating a tight coupling between cache efficiency and model quality.

By Shriniwas Ramesh Suram
arXiv AI
Jun 3

Fine-Tuning and Serving Gemma 4 31B on Google Cloud TPU: A Technical Comparison with GPU Baselines

arXiv:2605. 25645v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present the first end-to-end demonstration of fine-tuning and serving Google's Gemma 4 31B model on TPU hardware, providing an empirical comparison of TPU and GPU platforms for large language model adaptation.

By Jatin Kishnani, Mayank Goel, Amit Singh, Pulkit Agrawal, Sairanjan Mishra
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

DrainSinkhorn: Safe Elimination for Batched Entropic Optimal Transport

DrainSinkhorn is a verifier‑gated active‑packing layer that improves batched entropic optimal transport (EOT) by eliminating finished problems from subsequent Sinkhorn updates. It combines candidate‑axis packing, a one‑sided screen, verifier‑gated retirement, and physical compaction, while keeping the EOT objective, per‑instance map, and stopping rule unchanged. The method achieves state‑of‑the‑art execution speedups—up to 4.11× faster on MetroPT‑3 and 3.80× on ImageNet‑32 feature couplings—across multiple backends and tolerance settings. whyItMatters":"The technique delivers significant runtime reductions for heterogeneous batched‑EOT workloads, enabling faster and more efficient optimal transport computations in practical machine‑learning pipelines."

By Xinyang Wen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

Cacheable by Design? Training Mixture-of-Experts Routers for Locality Against the Edge Memory-Bandwidth Wall: A Pre-Registered Negative Result with a Systems Measurement Study

Serving a 235B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model on a single 8 GB GPU is bottlenecked not by compute but by memory bandwidth: decode must stream each token's active experts from whichever tier holds them, and on consumer hardware most experts sit on an SSD far slower than RAM. We quantify this bandwidth wall on Qwen3-235B (Q4_K_M, 134 GB): measured decode is 0.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Dynamic Expert Quantization for Scalable Mixture-of-Experts Inference

Dynamic Expert Quantization (DynaExq) is a runtime-aware mixed-precision serving system designed for single‑GPU Mixture‑of‑Experts (MoE) inference under a hard high‑bandwidth memory (HBM) envelope. It treats the problem as an online, budget‑constrained precision allocation task, keeping the most frequently used experts at higher precision while relegating the rest to low‑precision fallbacks. By estimating expert hotness from router traces and asynchronously promoting or demoting experts, DynaExq maintains a fully materialized expert set during the forward pass, improving accuracy and throughput compared to static post‑training quantization and offloading/prefetch baselines. whyItMatters":"DynaExq enables efficient deployment of large MoE models on memory‑limited GPUs by dynamically allocating precision based on runtime expert usage, thereby reducing memory footprint and latency while boosting accuracy and throughput."

By Kexin Chu, Dawei Xiang, Zixu Shen, Yiwei Yang, Zecheng Liu, Wei Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

Scaling Zero-Order Pretraining through Model Sharding

arXiv:2609.37899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Zero-order optimization (ZO) trains without backpropagation, making it relevant to forward-only hardware and non-differentiable loss, but its gradient...

By Francois Chaubard, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Chris R\'e
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4

UltraEP: Unleash MoE Training and Inference on Rack-Scale Nodes with Near-Optimal Load Balancing

arXiv:2606. 04101v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale expert parallelism (EP) is becoming pivotal for training and serving frontier MoE models, but it also amplifies device-level expert load imbalance into compute stragglers, token all-to-all bottlenecks, and activation-memory spikes.

By Xinming Wei, Chao Jin, Tuo Dai, Yinmin Zhong, Shan Yu, Chengxu Yang, Bingyang Wu, Zili Zhang, Jing Mai, Qianchao Zhu, Zhouyang Li, Yuliang Liu, Guojie Luo