arXiv:2607. 25376v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), variational inference is a widely adopted framework for modeling uncertainty in a distributional way, with the evidence lower bound (ELBO) serving as the standard objective function.
arXiv:2605. 08446v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bayesian neural networks are typically trained against the evidence lower bound (ELBO), whose Jensen gap closes only when the variational posterior is exact.
SiST‑GNN introduces a simultaneous spatial‑temporal message‑passing framework for dynamic graph neural networks, fusing per‑node temporal embeddings with spatial aggregation in a single operation. By maintaining a recurrent hidden state per node and treating it as a cross‑time edge, the model jointly reasons over topology and evolution. Experiments on link‑prediction and node‑classification benchmarks show significant improvements over prior methods, achieving up to 158% gains in live‑update link prediction and outperforming discrete‑time baselines by 7–23% in dynamic node classification.
arXiv:2607. 24583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large scale Bayesian nonparametrics (BNP) learner such as Stochastic Variational Inference (SVI) can handle datasets with large class number and large training size at fractional cost.
arXiv:2609. 19210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph neural networks are widely used for transductive node classification, with accuracy typically measured on randomly drawn train/validation/test splits.
arXiv:2607. 10804v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications where distribution shift is un-avoidable.
The paper introduces Latent-Posterior Alignment (LPA), a phenomenon where predictive uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks with Bayesian output layers decreases as latent representations align with lower‑variance posterior directions, even without posterior variance contraction. Through interventional experiments, the authors demonstrate LPA’s functional role in shaping uncertainty and propose Alignment‑Guided Learning (AGL) to explicitly promote this alignment during training. AGL reduces predictive uncertainty, preserves accuracy, and improves structural calibration, ensuring model confidence reflects data density.
arXiv:2602. 00387v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian neural networks promise calibrated uncertainty but require $O(mn)$ parameters for standard mean-field Gaussian posteriors.
arXiv:2603. 24304v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) deliver strong performance on graph tasks, but their accuracy drops significantly under out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios.
arXiv:2606. 06293v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Whilst the vulnerability of graph neural networks (GNNs) to adversarial attacks poses a critical threat to graph representation learning, the understanding of the robust generalization behavior remains a fundamental challenge in the adversarial setting.
arXiv:2607. 28248v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of deep neural networks in safety-critical domains demands reliable estimates of predictive confidence, yet conventional architectures lack principled uncertainty quantification.
arXiv:2606. 16214v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern deep learning models remain notoriously prone to overconfidence, limiting their reliability in high-stakes applications.