arXiv:2607. 06979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables training shared models on private, on-device data, but production deployments remain constrained to slow, multi-day refresh cycles due to the complexity of coordinating massive client populations.
By Dhruv Garg, Neha Lakhani, Debopam Sanyal, Myungjin Lee, Alexey Tumanov, Ada Gavrilovska
arXiv:2606. 01607v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is a decentralized approach that enables collaborative model training without exposing raw data.
By Nazmus Shakib Shadin, Aaron Cummings, Xinyue Zhang, Bobin Deng
arXiv:2509. 10691v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Decentralized federated learning enables collaborative model training without a central server, but shared model updates can still leak sensitive information through inversion, reconstruction, and membership inference attacks.
By Fardin Jalil Piran, Zhiling Chen, Yang Zhang, Qianyu Zhou, Jiong Tang, Farhad Imani
arXiv:2606. 02563v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous Differential Privacy (HDP) in Federated Learning (FL) allows clients to select individual privacy budgets ($\varepsilon_i$) according to institutional policies and data sensitivity.
By Farhin Farhad Riya, Olivera Kotevska, Jinyuan Stella Sun
arXiv:2607. 03334v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The federated learning (FL) paradigm fosters distributed pervasive computing combined with artificial intelligence techniques, allowing for optimized data usage and improved mitigation of privacy concerns.
By Andrea De Luna, Susanna Peretti, Chiara Contoli, Alessandro Bogliolo
arXiv:2606. 26822v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) has become a foundational paradigm for privacy-preserving distributed intelligence, yet its scalability remains fundamentally constrained by communication bottlenecks, device heterogeneity, and the challenges of training under statistically non-IID data.
By Farwa Ikram, Dipanwita Thakur, Antonella Guzzo, Giancarlo Fortino
Heterogeneous Differential Privacy (HDP) in Federated Learning (FL) allows clients to select individual privacy budgets ($\varepsilon_i$) according to institutional policies and data sensitivity. In practice, many HDP-FL systems employ $\varepsilon$-aware server aggregation to improve model utility by re-weighting client updates according to their declared privacy budgets.
arXiv:2608. 15153v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differentially private federated learning must balance privacy protection against model accuracy and training efficiency.
By Wenjing Wei, Alla Jammine, Farid Nait-Abdesselam
arXiv:2608. 01426v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables distributed optimization and learning across decentralized edge devices while preserving data privacy, but its performance is fundamentally constrained by heterogeneous data distributions, limited communication resources, and energy availability.
By Furkan Bagci, Busra Tegin, Mohammad Kazemi, Tolga M. Duman
arXiv:2608. 14654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative paradigm that enables multiple devices to train a global model while preserving local data privacy.
By Hai Anh Tran, Cuong Ta, Truong X. Tran
The paper introduces the Private Computation Space (PCS), an open‑source federated learning system designed for agriculture that protects farmer data using asynchronous federated learning, differential privacy, and trusted execution environments. PCS runs on commodity hardware and is resilient to rural infrastructure challenges. In two real‑world deployments—nitrogen monitoring in New York and evapotranspiration prediction in California—PCS achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.71 and an $R^2$ of 0.84, improving single‑site model accuracy by 22.4% and 9.1% respectively while preserving privacy.
By Shuangyu Lei, Muhammad Salman Abid, Jacob Belding, Sam Mosher, Manushi B. Trivedi, Shivranjani Baruah, Liam Wickes-Do, Andrew Anderson, Braulio Dumba, Alyssa Whitcraft, Ritvik Sahajpal, Sijin Li, Kelly Robbins, Michael Gore, Margaret Frank, Steven Wolf, Liz Jones, Abraham Stroock, Kaitlin Gold, Hakim Weatherspoon
The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee