arXiv Machine Learning

ECP-Bench: Benchmarking and Learning Entertainment Content Promotion with Foundation Models

arXiv AI
Oct 15

Personalized LLM Recommendation with Semantic IDs: Autoregressive Beam Search vs. Multi-Token Prediction

arXiv:2610.15864v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale personalization is shifting from embedding-table retrieval to LLM-based recommenders that generate the Semantic ID (SID) of the item to r...

By Sejoon Oh, Fernando Amat Gil, Evan Smothers, Dan Iter, Mark Thornburg, Dawit Mureja Argaw, Sourabh Medapati, Thea Wang, Ria Verma, Qiuling Xu, Harshit Syal, Ehsan Gholami, Moumita Bhattacharya, Ashish Rastogi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

From Interests to Semantic IDs: Retrieval-Grounded Credit Assignment for Generative Recommendation

The paper introduces a retrieval‑grounded credit‑assignment method for generative recommenders that use Semantic IDs (SIDs). By structuring each autoregressive trace into a history summary, a set of interest hypotheses, and a final SID, a frozen retriever verifies each hypothesis as a catalog query. Rewards are assigned at the hypothesis level when any query retrieves the target within the top‑K, allowing distinct updates for rollouts that share the same SID reward and improving SID recommendation performance on Amazon Reviews datasets.

arXiv AI
Oct 5

GISTBench: Evaluating LLM User Understanding via Evidence-Based Interest Verification

GISTBench is a benchmark designed to assess how well Large Language Models understand users by extracting and verifying user interests from their interaction histories in recommendation systems. It introduces two new metric families—Interest Groundedness (IG) and Interest Specificity (IS)—to measure the accuracy and distinctiveness of LLM-generated user profiles. The benchmark includes a synthetic dataset built from real user interactions on a global short‑form video platform, validated through user surveys, and evaluates a range of open‑weight and proprietary LLMs, uncovering limitations in their ability to count and attribute engagement signals.

By Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Muhammad Rafay Azhar, Abdalaziz Sawwan, Boyu Fang, Yuchen Liu, Jiayi Liu, Hanchao Yu, Qi Guo, Jianyu Wang, Fei Liu, Xiangjun Fan
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Safety as a Constraint: Fine-Tuning a LLM Recommender to Explain Itself

The paper presents a method for fine‑tuning a large language model (LLM) recommender to generate personalized, non‑harmful explanations for its recommendations. By training two LLM‑judge reward models and using constrained GRPO, the authors achieve a significant increase in the PASS rate for all three criteria, from 0.649 to 0.956 on their own judges and from 0.677 to 0.931 on an independent judge. The fine‑tuned model maintains its original recommendation performance, demonstrating that LLM‑based recommenders can be adapted to complex tasks without loss of effectiveness.

By Jiashu He, Emma Yanyang Kong, JJ Tan, David Fagnan
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Long Story Short: Story-level Video Understanding from 20K Short Films

The paper introduces Short‑Films 20K (SF20K), a large publicly available movie dataset comprising 20,143 amateur films totaling 3,582 hours, with an average length of 12 minutes per film. Accompanying the dataset is SF20K‑Test, a manual open‑ended question‑answering benchmark featuring 95 movies and 979 question‑answer pairs. Analysis of the benchmark shows limited data leakage, highlights the necessity of long‑term reasoning, and demonstrates that instruction tuning on the large‑scale dataset significantly boosts vision‑language model performance.

By Ridouane Ghermi, Xi Wang, Vicky Kalogeiton, Ivan Laptev
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluation

arXiv:2606. 26429v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM evaluation relies on two complementary but often disconnected signals: static benchmarks with objective correctness labels and arena-style preference data that better reflect open-ended user interactions.

By Aaron J. Li, Hao Huang, Youngmin Park, Yitong Ma, Wei-Lin Chiang, Li Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Bin Yu, Ion Stoica