The paper investigates whether graph structure improves microservice root‑cause analysis by conducting a controlled study on the RCAEval benchmark. Using identical features, optimizers, and evaluation protocols across three model variants, the authors find no consistent advantage for graph‑based models over flat models, with a negligible Avg@5 difference (0.003, p=0.844). They identify two benchmark properties—limited fault injection and a non‑uniform telemetry schema—that bias results, and propose a new model, PSC‑GRCA, which achieves higher Avg@5 mainly through a system prior rather than graph information.
arXiv:2606. 08590v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Kubernetes incidents are diagnosed reliably only when a root-cause system's reported gains come from incident evidence rather than scenario-specific shortcuts.
arXiv:2607. 28545v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models can write, patch, and search code, but oncall root cause analysis (RCA) demands something different: reasoning over noisy metrics, logs, traces, and source code, starting from ambiguous user-facing reports, often hours after the incident began.
arXiv:2609.36686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying the root cause of an anomaly among hundreds of sensors is critical for preventing safety incidents and costly downtime in complex monitored...
arXiv:2607. 27290v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern telecommunication, cloud, and microservice systems emit correlated alarm cascades when components fail.
The paper investigates the reliability of language‑model judges used as measurement instruments on shared endpoints. Through two preregistered audits of 52,988 requests, the authors found that repeat rankings and byte‑identical replays fell far short of required thresholds, revealing significant instability. They identify three mechanisms—label‑to‑meaning bias, candidate gaps below the noise floor, and input permutation noise—that explain the gap, and propose a snapshot‑identity ladder, design rules, and a reporting checklist to mitigate such failures.
The paper investigates how causal action verifiers, which guard language agents’ tool calls by checking identifiability against a committed action‑state graph, can be compromised through small graph misspecifications. By removing a single bidirected edge or reversing an arrowhead, the authors demonstrate that a verifier (CIVeX) that originally had zero false executions can suffer false execution rates up to 48.9%, with most of those executions being harmful and overall utility dropping dramatically. An additional attestation step that samples executions can detect these attacks with few false alarms, but it also leads to many wrongful rejections that reduce beneficial actions and incur significant experimental costs. whyItMatters":"The study shows that even minor errors in the verifier’s underlying graph can drastically undermine safety and performance, highlighting the need for robust auditing mechanisms."
The paper investigates a failure mode in Graph-JEPA, a joint‑embedding predictive model trained on a large scientific‑reasoning graph. Despite achieving high linear‑probe accuracy and effective rank, the learned representation contains almost no usable instance information, as shown by retrieval metrics. The authors diagnose the issue to variance allocation in the objective, propose a repair that restores near‑perfect information recovery, and demonstrate that the problem persists even after repair, highlighting limitations in the evaluation metrics used.
The paper reports a preregistered audit of language‑model judges used as measurement instruments, revealing that the assumption that a model’s responses remain stable over time is invalid. Across nearly 53,000 audited requests, repeat rankings and byte‑identical replays fell far below required reliability thresholds, with three identified mechanisms—label‑to‑meaning bias, candidate gaps below the noise floor, and input permutation noise—explaining the discrepancy. The study proposes a three‑level snapshot‑identity framework, eight design rules, and a reporting checklist to prevent such reliability failures in future evaluations.
arXiv:2608. 08968v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Microservice root cause analysis (RCA) requires correlating failures across heterogeneous telemetry within complex service dependency graphs.
arXiv:2608. 02464v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents fail mid-episode -- they loop, cascade tool errors, drift off goal, fabricate results, or silently absorb corrupted content -- and the standard remedy, judging every step with a second LLM, costs more than the agent itself.
TriFleetRCA is an on‑premise pipeline that performs root‑cause analysis for Kubernetes using a single GPU. It gathers evidence at pod, namespace, or cluster scope, deduplicates and ranks it with BM25, filters runbooks through an ingest guard, and returns a root cause with supporting evidence lines. In a live cluster with four injected faults, the system achieved hit rates of 0.85–0.95 across scopes, improved accuracy with deduplication, and demonstrated robust defense against poisoned runbooks.
arXiv:2608. 15286v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce AgentRelBench, an environment-agnostic reliability instrument that computes ground-truth, severity-priced damage from database state diffs across repeated runs, with no LLM in the measurement path, demonstrated on EnterpriseOps-Gym.