arXiv AI

Learning Safe Flow Matching Robot Policies from Binary Feasibility Oracles

The paper introduces an oracle-guided differentiable safeguard for flow-matching robot policies that ensures safety constraints are met without explicit constraint models. By using binary feasibility queries during both forward and backward passes, the method corrects unsafe updates and incorporates local boundary information into learning signals. Experiments on obstacle-aware robotic manipulation show that the approach achieves 100% constraint satisfaction while maintaining task performance.

arXiv AI
Sep 12

ActSafeGuard: Differentiable and Training-Aligned Constraint Enforcement for Flow-Matching Policies

arXiv:2609. 11697v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) and World-Action Models (WAMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in general-purpose robotic manipulation, yet their generated actions may violate hard physical constraints and therefore be unsafe or infeasible for deployment.

By Jianming Ma, Rongjun Jin, Xiaxi Si, Yang Zhang, Yiheng Li, Yue Gao
arXiv AI
Sep 25

CrossSafe: Towards Cross-Embodiment Latent Safety Filters

CrossSafe proposes embodiment-conditioned safety filtering that uses a Hamilton‑Jacobi reachability value function shared across robots while conditioning on each robot’s morphology and kinematics via a morphology‑aware latent representation. The method performs reachability analysis directly in latent space, enabling a single policy trained on multiple bimanual robot embodiments and manipulation tasks to generalize zero‑shot to a held‑out embodiment and reduce collision rates. Experiments on five embodiments and five tasks demonstrate that training with more embodiments improves generalization.

By Ihab Tabbara, Yuxuan Yang, Hussein Sibai
arXiv AI
2d ago

AegisFlow: Training-Free Non-Myopic Path-Safe Guided Flow Matching

AegisFlow is a training‑free framework that guides generative models, such as diffusion and flow matching, along safe paths by formulating the problem as a global optimal control task. It incorporates a time‑varying barrier function into the cost functional, enabling non‑myopic enforcement of constraints throughout the entire generative trajectory. Experiments show that AegisFlow outperforms existing methods in text‑guided image manipulation and robotic planning, achieving a better balance between target alignment and constraint satisfaction.

By Kunpeng Liu, Boshi Zhang, Keyou You
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

ObstaDiff is a diffusion-policy framework that introduces a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder to generate structured representations of targets, obstacles, and background. By aligning these representations, the policy produces end-effector trajectories that focus on a target-centered bottleneck pose while accounting for surrounding obstacles. In real-robot greenhouse trials, ObstaDiff achieved a 75.41% task success rate and an 8.20% obstacle collision rate, outperforming existing imitation-learning baselines in cluttered agricultural settings.

By Jiawen Wang, Kevin Yao, Khalid Jawed
arXiv AI
Oct 12

UniConFlow: A Unified Constrained Flow-Matching Framework for Certified Motion Planning

UniConFlow is a unified constrained flow‑matching framework that generates robot trajectories while systematically handling both equality and inequality constraints such as collision avoidance, actuation limits, and dynamic consistency. It introduces a prescribed‑time zeroing function to shape a time‑varying guidance field during inference, and employs a violation‑segment extraction protocol and trajectory compression to address computational challenges in long‑horizon, high‑dimensional planning. Experiments on a double inverted pendulum, a real‑to‑sim car racing task, and a sim‑to‑real manipulation task show that UniConFlow outperforms state‑of‑the‑art generative planners and conventional optimization baselines on certified motion planning metrics like safety, kinodynamic consistency, and action feasibility.

By Zewen Yang, Xiaobing Dai, Dian Yu, Zhijun Li, Majid Khadiv, Sandra Hirche, Sami Haddadin