← Back to all news
arXiv AI

RAGScope: A Leakage-Controlled, Cost-Aware Evidence-Gating Protocol for RAG Hallucination Triage

RAGScope is a leakage‑controlled, cost‑aware protocol that evaluates evidence‑gating mechanisms for retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) systems using only the task input, retrieved context, and answer text. The enhanced gate, RAGScope‑E, achieves an AUROC of 0.798 and an average precision of 0.660 on three RAGTruth tasks, outperforming ROUGE‑L by 0.034 in pooled AP and delivering 0.748 precision within a top‑10% review budget. It operates quickly (6.22 ms per example on CPU) and demonstrates that cheap evidence gates can effectively triage RAG outputs, though calibration must be validated and adapted for each target domain.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Sep 17

AutoTuneBench: Trustworthy Measurement for Agent Auto-Tuning of LLM Serving Engines

AutoTuneBench introduces a trustworthy measurement protocol for evaluating how large language model agents auto‑tune GPU kernels and serving engines. The benchmark addresses four failure modes—strawman baselines, machine‑dependent timing, saturated tasks, and infrastructure defects—by enforcing code‑frozen protocols, database validation, anti‑cheat checks, pre‑registered comparisons, and external result anchoring. Using this protocol, the authors demonstrate that previously reported speedups are inflated, revealing more modest improvements across different engines and machines.

By Li Chen
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Clean Engineering, Unstable Measurement: A Preregistered Reliability Failure of Black-Box LLM Observers on Shared Endpoints

The paper reports a preregistered audit of language‑model judges used as measurement instruments, revealing that the assumption that a model’s responses remain stable over time is invalid. Across nearly 53,000 audited requests, repeat rankings and byte‑identical replays fell far below required reliability thresholds, with three identified mechanisms—label‑to‑meaning bias, candidate gaps below the noise floor, and input permutation noise—explaining the discrepancy. The study proposes a three‑level snapshot‑identity framework, eight design rules, and a reporting checklist to prevent such reliability failures in future evaluations.

By Haoyaun Zhu, Jie Zhang
llms
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 16

LSREP: A Longitudinal State-Replay Protocol for Evaluating Conversational Memory, with ICE v2 as an Audited Local-First Architecture

The paper introduces LSREP, a Longitudinal State‑Replay Evaluation Protocol designed to assess how conversational memory evolves over time, incorporating ordered replay, lifecycle schedules, repeated probes, evolving reference answers, and mechanism‑fidelity checks. It applies LSREP to ICE v2, a local‑first memory middleware, and reports that on three ordinary‑density datasets ICE v2 achieves near‑zero mean quality difference from vector‑RAG while using fewer fragments but slightly more prompt tokens, yet fails catastrophically on a dense dataset. In a public diagnostic, ICE v2 underperforms pure vector‑RAG on LongMemEval, revealing significant multi‑session and temporal failures and a quality‑cost trade‑off rather than superior efficiency.

By Deepesh Sonar
ragnlp
More like this →
arXiv AI
3d ago

Hard-Gate Candidacy in a Deployed Validator Suite

The paper evaluates hard‑gate candidacy for validators in a deployed generative‑agent system by measuring how well each validator’s firing separates successful from failed builds. Across 13 validators and thousands of builds, only a few checks show statistically significant separation, while many fail to distinguish or never fire. The study highlights that skipped checks are recorded as passes, limiting detectable failure rates and underscoring the need for clearer evaluation records.

By Xin Xu
agents
More like this →