arXiv AI

Retro-Expert: Collaborative Reasoning for Interpretable Retrosynthesis

arXiv:2508. 10967v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrosynthesis prediction aims to infer the reactant molecules based on a given product molecule, which is a fundamental task in chemical synthesis.

arXiv AI
Jul 17

RetroAgent: Harnessing LLMs to Search Over Structured Memory for Agentic Retrosynthesis Planning

arXiv:2607. 14512v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-step retrosynthesis planning seeks to decompose a target molecule into commercially available building blocks through a sequence of feasible reactions.

By Yanqiao Zhu, Jingru Gan, Xiaoqi Sun, Fang Sun, Yidan Shi, Md Mofijul Islam, Chao Shang, Wenhao Gao, Connor W. Coley, Yizhou Sun, Wei Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

When Single Answer Is Not Enough: Rethinking Single-Step Retrosynthesis Benchmarks for LLMs

arXiv:2602. 03554v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent progress has expanded the use of large language models (LLMs) in drug discovery, including synthesis planning.

By Bogdan Zagribelnyy, Ivan Ilin, Maksim Kuznetsov, Nikita Bondarev, Mathieu Reymond, Roman Schutski, Thomas MacDougall, Rim Shayakhmetov, Zulfat Miftakhutdinov, Mikolaj Mizera, Vladimir Aladinskiy, Alex Aliper, Alex Zhavoronkov
arXiv AI
Jul 2

Agentic generation of verifiable rules for deterministic, self-expanding reaction classification

arXiv:2607. 01061v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-assisted synthesis planning breaks target molecules into accessible precursors using large libraries of reaction rules that assign each transformation a deterministic, interpretable label.

By Daniel Armstrong, Maarten Dobbelaere, Valentas Olikauskas, Helena Avila, Octavian Susanu, J\'er\^ome Waser, Philippe Schwaller
arXiv AI
Aug 10

Strategy-first synthesis planning for complex natural products

arXiv:2608. 07454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The total synthesis of a complex molecule is among the most demanding intellectual and experimental feats in chemistry: a chemist must plan many steps ahead for how to assemble simple building blocks into an intricate target, devise backup strategies, and anticipate procedural challenges.

By Daniel Armstrong, Xuan-Vu Nguyen, Octavian Susanu, Gabriel Gibberd, Th\'eo A. Neukomm, Tadd\"aus Strunden, Dan Forster, Morgane Delattre, Shawn Teh, Cl\'ement Rols, John Federice, Hayden Leatherwood, M. Lavelle Barnes, Maarten R. Dobbelaere, Peter Wipf, Jon T. Njardarson, Jieping Zhu, Philippe Schwaller
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17

From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 18089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training pipelines that combine supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with reinforcement learning (RL) have emerged as the key recipe for transforming large language models (LLMs) into robust reasoners.

By Lingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen, Martin Q. Ma, Xiangchen Song, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail Yurochkin, Taylor W. Killian, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Kun Zhang, Eric P. Xing, Zhengzhong Liu
arXiv AI
Jun 3

LatentChem: From Textual CoT to Latent Thinking in Chemical Reasoning

arXiv:2602. 07075v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current chemical large language models (LLMs) predominantly rely on explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to solve complex reasoning problems.

By Xinwu Ye, Yicheng Mao, Yuxuan Liao, Jia Zhang, Yimeng Liu, Li Hao, Fang Wu, Zhiwei Li, Zehong Wang, Zhiyuan Liu, Zhenfei Yin, Li Yuan, Philip Torr, Huan Sun, xiangxiang Zeng, Mengdi Wang, Le Cong, Shenghua Gao, Xiangru Tang