arXiv:2607. 01773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ontology construction requires deciding which objects, attributes, and structural relations should be accepted as valid knowledge.
By Yujin Yang, Heejung Lee
arXiv:2608. 06331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis.
By Donna Hooshmand, Shubham Shahi, Cameron Barrie, Abhratanu Dutta, Marko Sterbentz, Harper Pack, Kristian J. Hammond
arXiv:2606. 08477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge extraction from symbolic data often produces abstractions that are formally defined but not immediately interpretable by users.
By Alain Gutierrez, Marianne Huchard, Pierre Martin, Andr\'e Miralles, Violaine Prince
arXiv:2507. 09751v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, but exhibit problems with logical consistency in their output.
By Bradley P. Allen, Prateek Chhikara, Thomas Macaulay Ferguson, Filip Ilievski, Paul Groth
arXiv:2607. 18029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata.
By Blake G. Fitch, Cato Elia Kurtz
arXiv:2607. 15776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: OWL ontologies provide a formal knowledge representation framework that enables semantic reasoning, and have been widely adopted across domains such as healthcare and bioinformatics.
By Hui Yang, Jiaoyan Chen, Yiping Song, Renate Schmidt, Wen Zhang
arXiv:2606. 08571v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models frequently fail in a characteristic way: rather than acknowledging ignorance, they produce fluent but incorrect answers to questions that lie beyond their knowledge boundaries.
By Subramanyam Sahoo
arXiv:2606. 26101v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable evaluation of large language models should separate supported answering from unsupported guessing without conflating either with data contamination, prompt idiosyncrasy, or generic refusal behavior.
By Renwei Meng, Bowen Zhang, Jian Wang, Xican Wang, Haoyi Wu, Xuanyan Qiu, Shengan Yang
arXiv:2607. 14494v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complex knowledge base question answering (KBQA) is commonly approached through either information retrieval over a question-specific subgraph or semantic parsing into an executable logical form.
By Yiming Zhang, Koji Tsuda
arXiv:2606. 15646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, but their lack of interpretable reasoning and tendency to hallucinate pose significant challenges for legal applications.
By Deepa Tilwani, Yash Saxena, Ankur Padia, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Manas Gaur
arXiv:2608. 10970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in generating semantically relevant concepts and relations, making them promising tools for taxonomy enrichment.
By Zeinab Ghamlouch, Mehwish Alam
arXiv:2606. 24619v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Competency Questions (CQs) are the central component of CQ-verification, an established process in which an ontology is evaluated against a set of natural language questions to determine whether the intended purpose of the ontology has been properly modelled.
By Anna Sofia Lippolis, Mohammad Javad Saeedizade, Robin Keskis\"arkk\"a, Aldo Gangemi, Eva Blomqvist, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese