arXiv AI
Jul 10
TAG: A Lightweight Framework for Test-Driven Agentic Artifact Generation
arXiv:2607. 02615v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generating structured artifacts with Large Language Models - e.
The agent creates, we validate: A Lightweight Framework for Agentic Artifact Generation
arXiv:2607. 02615v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generating structured artifacts with Large Language Models - e.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 13
The Patchwork Problem in LLM-Generated Code
arXiv:2607. 08981v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-generated code often compiles, passes tests, and appears correct, yet breaks once deployed.
arXiv AI
Jul 14
TENET: One Step Toward Test-Driven Development for Repository-Level Code Generation
arXiv:2509. 24148v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Test-Driven Development (TDD) is a widely adopted practice that requires developers to create and execute tests alongside implementation.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows
arXiv:2607. 14896v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Addressing a structural-engineering request requires more than a single answer; it requires a chain of interdependent artifacts: interpreted requirements, a computable model, validation records, solver outputs, code-check records, and a final report.
arXiv AI
Jul 21
AEVAL: From Anecdotal to Deterministic Testing for Agentic Skill Workflows
arXiv:2607. 16345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern agentic systems increasingly rely on skills: installable packages of natural language and code that teach an LLM agent to perform a domain task.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13
Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming
Production LLM agents such as Claude Code and Codex operate over untrusted content, files, commands, and workspace state, making safety failures directly actionable. Red-teaming must therefore keep pace with evolving models and tools.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
A Unified Framework for the Evaluation of LLM Agentic Capabilities
arXiv:2605. 27898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents, reliable assessment of their agentic capabilities has become essential.
arXiv AI
Jul 14
Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming
arXiv:2607. 11698v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production LLM agents such as Claude Code and Codex operate over untrusted content, files, commands, and workspace state, making safety failures directly actionable.
arXiv AI
Jun 4
From Agent Traces to Trust: Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
arXiv:2606. 04990v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents increasingly solve complex tasks by interacting with external tools, retrieval systems, memory modules, environments, and other agents.
arXiv AI
Jun 18
SafeClawBench: Separating Semantic, Audit-Evidence, and Sandbox Harm in Tool-Using LLM Agents
arXiv:2606. 18356v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using language-model agents introduce security failures that go beyond unsafe text: they can disclose protected objects, write persistent memory, send messages, modify databases, or trigger harmful code and tool effects.
arXiv AI
Jun 11
When Generic Prompt Improvements Hurt: Evaluation-Driven Iteration for LLM Applications
arXiv:2601. 22025v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating Large Language Model (LLM) applications differs from conventional software testing because outputs are probabilistic, semantically variable, and sensitive to prompt and model changes.
arXiv AI
Jul 10
From Prompts to Contracts: Harness Engineering for Auditable Enterprise LLM Agents
arXiv:2607. 08028v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise large language model (LLM) applications often begin as prototypes whose behavior is carried by prompts and retrieval context.