MemMA is a plug‑and‑play multi‑agent framework that coordinates the memory cycle of memory‑augmented LLM agents on both forward and backward paths. On the forward path, a Meta‑Thinker guides a Memory Manager for construction and a Query Reasoner for iterative retrieval. On the backward path, MemMA performs in‑situ self‑evolving memory construction, generating probe QA pairs, verifying the memory, and converting failures into repair actions before finalization. Experiments on LoCoMo show that MemMA consistently outperforms existing baselines across multiple LLM backbones and improves three different storage backends.
By Minhua Lin, Zhiwei Zhang, Hanqing Lu, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Tang, Qi He, Xiang Zhang, Suhang Wang
arXiv:2609.39765v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agent memory faces heterogeneous access needs: a single-hop question may require one piece of evidence, whereas a multi-hop question must combine evide...
By Xiaoqiang Wang, Bang Liu
Agent memory faces heterogeneous access needs: a single-hop question may require one piece of evidence, whereas a multi-hop question must combine evidence from multiple sources. Predefined memory work...
arXiv:2605. 18421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution.
By Yuyao Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Mo Chi, Kaichi Yu, Yuhan Li, Miao Peng, Bing Tong, Chen Zhang, Yan Zhou, Jia Li
arXiv:2606. 17546v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving LLM-based agents improve mainly by changing their agent harness: the structured execution layer around a base model, including prompts, memory, tools, middleware, runtime state, and the model-tool interaction loop.
By Congjie Zheng, Chuanyi Xue, Bin Liang, Jun Yang, Changshui Zhang
arXiv:2606. 06054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personal AI agents increasingly rely on long-term memory to provide persistent personalization across sessions.
By Jiawen Zhang, Kejia Chen, Jiachen Ma, Yangfan Hu, Lipeng He, Yechao Zhang, Jian Liu, Xiaohu Yang, Tianwei Zhang, Ruoxi Jia
arXiv:2606. 04315v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents accumulate histories that outgrow their context windows, motivating a growing literature on memory systems.
By Zhikai Chen, Jialiang Gu, Junyu Yin, Xianxuan Long, Shenglai Zeng, Xiaoze Liu, Kai Guo, Keren Zhou, Jiliang Tang
arXiv:2605. 28732v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Memory is essential for enabling large language models to support long-horizon reasoning, yet existing memory systems remain unreliable and difficult to debug.
By Xinle Deng, Ruobin Zhong, Hujin Peng, Xiaoben Lu, Yanzhe Wu, Guang Li, Buqiang Xu, Yunzhi Yao, Jizhan Fang, Haoliang Cao, Junjie Guo, Yuan Yuan, Ziqing Ma, Yuanqiang Yu, Rui Hu, Baohua Dong, Hangcheng Zhu, Ningyu Zhang
arXiv:2606. 05684v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A central challenge for language agents is utilizing past experience to adapt to dynamic test-time conditions.
By Yunxiang Zhang, Yiheng Li, Ali Payani, Lu Wang
HarnessEvolve is a self‑evolving framework that improves agent harnesses—prompts, skills, tools, and execution logic—by learning from reference trajectories. It separates execution, evaluation, optimization, and gating into independent modules, addressing credit assignment failure, shortcut learning, and catastrophic forgetting. The approach uses reference trajectories to extract error signals, applies quality and performance gates to candidate updates, and validates updates on held‑out data, consistently outperforming state‑of‑the‑art baselines across diverse benchmarks.
By Wen Jiang, Mingmin Chu, Yimeng Tian, Qianxin Zhang, Haofei Yang, Rui Yang, Yang Liu, Tao Lv, Fangming Li
The paper introduces PACEvolve, a framework that improves self‑evolving agents powered by Large Language Models by addressing their tendency to become trapped in local contexts and repeat flawed hypotheses. It does so through three techniques: Hierarchical Context Management to prune memory, Momentum‑Based Backtracking to escape local minima, and a self‑adaptive Collaborative Evolution policy to balance refinement and knowledge transfer. These methods enable the agents to maintain a global view of search momentum and achieve state‑of‑the‑art results on complex evolutionary benchmarks.
By Minghao Yan, Bo Peng, Benjamin Coleman, Ziqi Chen, Zhouhang Xie, Shuo Chen, Zhankui He, Noveen Sachdeva, Isabella Ye, Weili Wang, Chi Wang, Ed H. Chi, Fernando Pereira, Wang-Cheng Kang, Derek Zhiyuan Cheng, Beidou Wang
Large language model (LLM) agents have achieved strong performance on a wide range of benchmarks, yet most evaluations assume static environments. In contrast, real-world deployment is inherently dynamic, requiring agents to continually align their knowledge, skills, and behavior with changing environments and updated task conditions.