arXiv:2510. 07884v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Weak-to-strong generalization provides a promising paradigm for scaling large language models (LLMs) by training stronger models on samples from aligned weaker ones, without requiring human feedback or explicit reward modeling.
By Houcheng Jiang, Junfeng Fang, Jiaxin Wu, Tianyu Zhang, Chen Gao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Yang Deng
The paper evaluates four Contrastive Decoding (CD) strategies for Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) and finds that Audio-Aware Decoding and Audio Contrastive Decoding are the most effective. Their performance varies across models, largely depending on the baseline error profile: CD reliably fixes errors where models incorrectly claim no audio or rely on uncertainty-driven guessing, but struggles with flawed reasoning or confident misassertions. A token-level analysis shows that CD’s suppression targets hesitation markers, explaining its limited impact on confident errors.
By Tzu-Quan Lin, Wei-Ping Huang, Yi-Cheng Lin, Hung-yi Lee
arXiv:2609.10394v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Current audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) benchmarks, like LRS3, rely heavily on clean, scripted and rehearsed speech. They fail to reflect the...
By Rishabh Jain, Aristeidis Papadopoulos, Zhaofeng Lin, Naomi Harte
The paper investigates whether audio large language models (Audio LLMs) can detect when their own transcriptions are unreliable. It finds that the models are poor at self-assessment and that existing methods offer limited detection. By leveraging audio-encoder representations, the authors develop a lightweight predictor that accurately flags unreliable transcriptions and can prompt user clarification without altering the underlying model.
By Amirhosein Javadi, Richa Dixit, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Minsik Cho, Devang Naik, Mohammad Samragh
arXiv:2510.12851v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) excel in Audio QA but often suffer from hallucinations ungrounded in the audio. To our knowledge, we are...
By Tsung-En Lin, Kuan-Yi Lee, Hung-Yi Lee
arXiv:2606. 23712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio-visual speech enhancement (AVSE) exploits visual cues such as lip movements to recover speech in noisy environments.
By Colombe Mboungou (MULTISPEECH), Mostafa Sadeghi (MULTISPEECH), Jean-Eudes Ayilo (MULTISPEECH), Romain Serizel (MULTISPEECH)
arXiv:2609.10366v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: While AVSR has achieved sub-1% word error rates on the standard LRS3 benchmark, its reliance on broadcast speech obscures whether this reflects true...
By Rishabh Jain, Naomi Harte
arXiv:2607. 00247v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large audio-language models (LALMs) frequently hallucinate by overriding acoustic evidence with language priors.
By Aaron Isidore Grace, Zhouyuan Huo, Weiran Wang
arXiv:2606. 02642v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the success of audio-visual large-language models (LLMs), they can produce plausible but ungrounded outputs, termed hallucination.
By Chenshuang Zhang, Kyeong Seon Kim, Chengxin Liu, Tae-Hyun Oh
arXiv:2604.14129v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: While Audio-Visual Language Models (AVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress over recent years, their reliability is bottlenecked by cross-modal ha...
By Ami Baid, Zihui Xue, Kristen Grauman
arXiv:2609.05871v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Audio-conditioned language models often underuse acoustic cues such as prosody, emotion, and non-speech sounds, raising the question of whether ASR-s...
By Song-ha Jo, Sehyun Lee, Soyoon Kim, Jaesik Choi, Sanghyuk Choi
RAMamba-Net is a new multimodal fusion network designed for auditory attention decoding (AAD) that combines EEG and electrooculography (EOG) signals. It uses a Mamba-enhanced band-aware convolutional Transformer to capture EEG band-specific patterns and long-range temporal dynamics, while a dual-branch encoder models EOG temporal and inter-channel dependencies. Cross‑modal attention and a reliability‑aware module estimate sample‑wise modality weights, improving fusion robustness and achieving a 5.76% accuracy gain over unimodal baselines on two AAD benchmarks.
By Xingyi He, Ziwei Wang, Dongrui Wu