arXiv Machine Learning

A Survey of LLM Prompt Datasets: Taxonomy, Linguistic Patterns, and Practical Uses

The paper presents a survey of 129 public large language model (LLM) prompt datasets, totaling over 1.22 TB and 673 million instances, and introduces a unified taxonomy for them. By analyzing seven datasets in depth, the authors identify lexical, syntactic, and semantic patterns that differentiate prompts from general text, and evaluate these patterns for tasks such as prompt filtering, source domain routing, and response quality assessment. They demonstrate that a 63‑dimensional linguistic feature set extracted on a CPU can match over 91 % of the F1 score of GPU‑based sentence embeddings while halving latency, and that structural features can effectively route prompts across datasets, though they may negatively impact response quality when prompt length is controlled.

arXiv AI
Aug 24

SCOPE: A Generative Approach for LLM Prompt Compression

SCOPE is a training‑free generative prompt‑compression framework that reduces LLM input length by chunking a prompt into semantically coherent segments, rewriting each chunk to be more concise, and then reconstructing a coherent prompt. Unlike token‑removal methods, SCOPE’s chunk‑level rewriting preserves critical information and text coherence, and includes optimization techniques for finer‑grained control of compression ratios. Extensive evaluations on question‑answering and summarization tasks show that SCOPE consistently outperforms selective compression baselines, especially at high compression ratios.

By Tinghui Zhang, Yifan Wang, Daisy Zhe Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Learning a Single Token to Replace Long System Prompts in LLMs

arXiv:2511.23271v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long system prompts are widely used to steer Large Language Models (LLMs), but repeatedly processing them at inference time is inefficient and cons...

By Jiancheng Dong, Pengyue Jia, Jingyu Peng, Maolin Wang, Yuhao Wang, Lixin Su, Xin Sun, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Xiangyu Zhao
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

Beyond Prompt and Parser Engineering: Soft-Prompt Tuning for Automated LLM Evaluation

The paper introduces soft‑prompt tuning as a lightweight, automated method for evaluating large language models (LLMs). By optimizing only ten soft‑prompt vectors—about 0.0006% of a 7B model’s parameters—within 150 steps, the approach adapts models to specific benchmark formats, improving format compliance while preserving knowledge accuracy. Experiments across seven models and eleven datasets show that this method matches strong evaluation‑harness baselines, enhances evaluation signals on challenging datasets, and yields cleaner outputs that align better with exact‑match scoring and independent LLM judges.

By Selen Erkan, Bastian Boll, Kristian Kersting, Bj\"orn Deiseroth, Letitia Parcalabescu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7

PROMPT2BOX:Improving LLM Weakness Discovery and Specificity Estimation by Uncovering Entailment Structure among Prompts

The paper introduces Prompt2Box, a method that embeds prompts into a box embedding space to capture both semantic similarity and specificity relations, addressing the limitation of traditional vector embeddings that conflate topical similarity with specificity. Using a trained encoder on existing and synthesized datasets, Prompt2Box achieves significant improvements, reducing specificity prediction error by 45% over a prompt-length baseline and identifying 13.5% more LLM weaknesses in hierarchical clustering compared to vector baselines. The authors also present a novel dimension‑reduction technique for visualizing and comparing box embeddings, and provide the code on GitHub.

By Neeladri Bhuiya, Shib Sankar Dasgupta, Andrew McCallum, Haw-Shiuan Chang
arXiv AI
Aug 12

A Cost-Efficient Routing Pipeline for Multilingual Short-Text Classification Using Small Language Models

arXiv:2608. 10939v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual short-text classification supports operational systems such as content moderation, customer support routing, and intent recognition, yet aggregate evaluation often hides large differences between high-resource and low-resource languages.

By Wajdi Ben Saad, Safa Madiouni