New device layouts pose a challenging modeling problem due to the lack of large datasets for each specific layout. Biosignal foundation models offer a plausible solution if they are able to generalize to new layouts effectively.
arXiv:2608. 02070v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely used in motor rehabilitation, disease diagnosis, and other neural engineering scenarios.
By Zhu Chen, Dingkun Liu, Yuheng Chen, Dongrui Wu
arXiv:2606. 00884v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study cross-subject emotion recognition from EEG, a practically important yet challenging problem in brain-computer interfaces.
By Jiaxin Qing, Lexin Li
arXiv:2608. 02070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely used in motor rehabilitation, disease diagnosis, and other neural engineering scenarios.
By Zhu Chen, Dingkun Liu, Yuheng Chen, Dongrui Wu
arXiv:2606. 04040v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces aim to decode naturalistic stimuli from neural signals, yet most progress to date has focused on vision and language.
By Jiaxin Qing, Junwei Lu, Lexin Li
arXiv:2606. 20673v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A central challenge in EEG authentication is that models are typically tied to the acquisition settings in which they are trained.
By Matin Fallahi, Patricia Arias-Cabarcos, Thorsten Strufe
arXiv:2601. 17883v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for brain-computer interfaces, aiming to learn transferable neural representations from large-scale heterogeneous recordings.
By Dingkun Liu, Yuheng Chen, Zhu Chen, Zhenyao Cui, Yaozhi Wen, Jiayu An, Jingwei Luo, Dongrui Wu
arXiv:2609.13507v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) decode neural activity to restore lost function. Typically, training a high-performance neural decoder requires a larg...
By Ben Tang, Zachary Spalding, Gregory B. Cogan
Brain4FMs is a unified benchmark for evaluating brain foundation models (BFMs) on both scalp EEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG). It incorporates 17 representative models and 21 public datasets spanning clinical diagnosis, sleep staging, communication, and affective computing, and offers dataset-aware preprocessing, cross‑subject evaluation, and standardized downstream workflows. The benchmark highlights that no single BFM consistently outperforms others across all tasks, modalities, and adaptation protocols, prompting further exploratory analyses of model‑specific spatial, spectral, and discrete representations.
By Fanqi Shen, Enhong Yang, Jiahe Li, Junru Hong, Xiaoran Pan, Zhizhang Yuan, Meng Li, Yang Yang
arXiv:2602. 10528v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a novel swap-adversarial framework that mitigates high inter-subject variability and the high-dimensional low-sample-size problem in electrocorticography (ECoG) data.
By Seongwon Jin, Hanseul Choi, Sunggu Yang, Sungho Park, Jibum Kim
arXiv:2604. 16926v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models have shown strong potential for learning generalizable representations from large-scale neural data, yet their clinical deployment is hindered by distribution shifts across clinical settings, devices, and populations.
By Gabriel Jason Lee, Jathurshan Pradeepkumar, Jimeng Sun
The paper introduces a Cross-Subject Perceived Speech Decoding (CPSD) framework that tackles the challenge of decoding perceived speech from non‑invasive brain recordings across different subjects. CPSD uses a two‑stage training process: first, contrastive learning pre‑trains a source model on multiple subjects to capture shared representations; second, personal specialization fine‑tunes the model for a target subject by extracting consistent components and further training on that subject’s data. A Positional Encoding‑based Spatial Attention (PESA) module is added to remap MEG/EEG data into a standardized reference space, improving cross‑subject consistency. Evaluations on three datasets (Armeni 2022, PKUEEG 2025, Broderick 2018) show that CPSD outperforms baseline methods by more than 6.8%, 15.4%, and 15.8% in Top‑10 accuracy, demonstrating its effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness.
By Aoke Zhang, Bo Wang, Xihong Wu, Heping Cheng, Jing Chen