Reward Learning through Ranking Mean Squared Error
arXiv:2601. 09236v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reward design remains a significant bottleneck in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to real-world problems.
arXiv:2608. 06310v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in reward modeling show a paradigm shift from discriminative reward models to generative reward models.
arXiv:2601. 09236v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reward design remains a significant bottleneck in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to real-world problems.
arXiv:2602. 07533v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reward models are critical for reinforcement learning from human feedback, as they determine the alignment quality and reliability of generative models.
arXiv:2604. 02091v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Rerankers play a pivotal role in refining retrieval results for Retrieval-Augmented Generation.
arXiv:2509. 02522v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have empowered large language models (LLMs) to tackle challenging reasoning tasks such as mathematics and programming, however existing RLVR methods often suffer from sparse reward signals and unstable policy gradient updates inherent to RL-based approaches.
arXiv:2606. 09380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a leading paradigm for improving the reasoning ability of large language models through outcome-based supervision.
arXiv:2509. 22851v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Margin-based optimization is fundamental to improving generalization and robustness in classification tasks.
arXiv:2601. 06487v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning has substantially improved the performance of LLM agents on tasks with verifiable outcomes, but it still struggles on open-ended agent tasks with vast solution spaces (e.
arXiv:2606. 01123v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) avoids explicit reward engineering by learning from pairwise human preference feedback.
arXiv:2608. 03119v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves LLM reasoning but typically relies on ground-truth (GT) answers, limiting scalability.
arXiv:2506. 13702v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Single-trajectory preference optimization methods learn from datasets of ((prompt, response, reward)) tuples, offering a practical alternative to pairwise preference learning by directly leveraging scalar feedback.
arXiv:2606. 10528v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) methods primarily rely on scalar rewards from a trained reward model (RM).
arXiv:2602. 17658v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward modeling is central to alignment pipelines such as RLHF, RLAIF, and PPO-based policy optimization, yet its reliability is constrained by limited and heterogeneous human preference data that are expensive to collect at scale.