arXiv Computer Vision

Loop to Look Better: Learning Adaptive Depth for Question-Guided Perception in Vision-Language Models

LoopLook introduces a lightweight encoder-side recurrent perception framework that equips pretrained Vision‑Language Models with adaptive visual depth. By repeatedly revisiting a middle‑to‑late window of the vision encoder and injecting question representations at each loop, it refines visual evidence in a task‑directed manner. The learned stopping mechanism and token‑wise Mixture‑of‑Looks allow each visual token to selectively integrate information across loops, yielding consistent performance gains across multiple backbones and benchmarks.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

AdaLoop: Thinking with the Vision Encoder

AdaLoop introduces a question‑conditioned visual recurrence framework for vision‑language models, allowing the vision encoder to adapt its computation to each question while keeping pretrained weights frozen. The method reuses encoder transformations across multiple iterations, improving performance over standard fine‑tuning and single‑pass baselines. Experiments on the VisRO dataset demonstrate gains across three VLM families on both in‑distribution and out‑of‑distribution examples.

By Xinran Nicole Han, Yiyang Lu, Katelyn Gan, Todd Zickler
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

Retrofitting Recurrent Vision-Language Models from Pretrained Backbones

The paper introduces a method to retrofit depth recurrence into pretrained vision‑language models, reducing the language backbone’s parameter count by pruning layers and looping over the remaining ones with linear adapters. A three‑stage recovery training—language‑only pretraining, vision‑language projector alignment, and full fine‑tuning—helps recover performance, with distillation from the non‑recurrent model further improving results. Experiments on TinyLLaVA‑1.4B show the retrofitted recurrent model outperforms the unpruned baseline while saving 23.3% of language parameters and performs better on reasoning‑oriented benchmarks.

By Madhav Iyengar, Andreas Geiger, Hilde K\"uhne
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 1

LoopVL: Recurrent Visual Intelligence

arXiv:2609.38426v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce LoopVL to study whether Loop Transformers can be effectively extended to vision- language models. LoopVL combines Module-Loop and Model-...

By Zhe Qian, Ziyang Gong, Zhongxing Xu, Hehan Li, Zhonghua Wang, Fei Luo, Mingxuan Wang, Xue Yang, Shiwei liu, Yanbiao Ma, Junchi Yan, Jungong Han
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

LearnPruner: Rethinking Attention-based Token Pruning in Vision Language Models

LearnPruner rethinks token pruning in vision‑language models by addressing shortcomings of attention mechanisms in vision encoders and large language models. The method uses a two‑stage approach: first a learnable pruning module removes redundant vision tokens after the vision encoder, then only task‑relevant tokens are kept in the LLM’s middle layer. Experiments show that LearnPruner retains about 95% of performance while using only 5.5% of vision tokens, achieving a 3.2× speed‑up.

By Rinyoichi Takezoe, Yaqian Li, Zihao Bo, Anzhou Hou, Mo Guang, Kaiwen Long
arXiv AI
Aug 28

PACE: A Unified Condense-and-Extract Paradigm for Fast VLM Inference

PACE introduces a training‑free Condense‑and‑Extract framework that speeds up Vision‑Language Model inference by first adaptively downsampling visual inputs before encoding and then selectively retaining essential tokens during decoding. The Adaptive Pixel Compressor (APC) reduces encoder workload while preserving global context, and the Dynamic Dual‑Attention Extractor (DDAE) keeps task‑critical details by fusing visual and language signals. Applied to Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B, PACE maintains 93.8% of performance using only 10% of visual tokens, achieving a 3.1× speedup in time to first token.

By Junjie Liu, Shengyuan Ye, Xu Chen
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

RECAP: Looking Once Is Not Enough for Vision-Language Reasoning

The paper introduces RECAP, a training method that enhances vision‑language models by incorporating temporally localized reactivation of image evidence—called visual revisit—into the reinforcement learning process. Visual revisit peaks are shown to predict correctness and causally improve performance; masking them hurts accuracy more than masking non‑peaks, while adding revisit peaks to failed reasoning partially restores correct answers. RECAP applies revisit‑conditioned advantage estimation, dynamic discounting, and gated value prediction to propagate final rewards through visually important reasoning steps, achieving significant gains on HallusionBench and other benchmarks without extra rewards or inference‑time changes.

By Zhaolu Kang, Tailong Luo, Chenxin Li, Yingjie He, Zhenyu Yu, Fengyu Zhou, Jiachen Qian, Lei Wei, Shuang Chen, Jiachen Li, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Rongchao Zhang, Zhengtao Yao, Hoi Leong Lee, Guansu Wang, Kaiyue Zhou
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

Perception or Reasoning? Diagnosing and Tackling Reinforcement Learning Bottlenecks in VLMs

The paper introduces Perception and Reasoning Attribution (PARA), a method that quantifies how much of a vision‑language model’s errors can be fixed by better perception versus stronger reasoning. PARA reveals that reinforcement learning (RL) benefits more from improving reasoning than perception, and motivates a new group‑relative attention distillation objective called GRAD. GRAD directly guides weaker rollouts toward the visual attention patterns of the best rollouts, consistently boosting performance across multiple model scales and benchmarks.

By Zeyuan Yang, Zhuohao Chen, Jiaben Chen, Yao Zhang, Maohao Shen, Chuang Gan
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Information-Regularized Attention for Visual-Centric Reasoning

arXiv:2607. 00434v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have become a paradigm for multimodal learning, yet remain unstable due to object hallucination, weak visual grounding, and catastrophic forgetting after full-parameter instruction tuning.

By Guohao Sun, Xiaofang Wang, Yash Patel, Mengchen Liu, Zhiqiang Tao, Praveen Krishnan
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

Look Back, Think Ahead: Visual Memory on Demand for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning

The paper introduces ViMoD, a lightweight framework that dynamically manages visual memory for multimodal large language models. ViMoD uses Deformable Aggregation of Region-wise Tokens (DART) to create content‑adaptive coarse representations linked to recoverable fine tokens, and Temporal Routing for Adaptive Contextual Evidence (TRACE) to anticipate and adjust evidence needs during reasoning. On the Qwen3‑VL‑4B model, ViMoD achieves superior performance across eight reasoning benchmarks with only a 20% visual token budget and minimal additional parameters.

By Yicheng Xue, Han Wu, Jufeng Yang, Minjing Dong, Xinghao Chen, Hanting Chen, Jianyuan Guo