arXiv:2606. 13796v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recursive training of generative models on their own outputs can lead to model collapse, a compounding drift away from the true data distribution.
By Na\"il B. Khelifa, Richard E. Turner, Ramji Venkataramanan
arXiv:2606. 03820v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We develop a quantitative approximation framework for diffusion distillation, viewing few-step sampling as error propagation under compositions of learned flow maps.
By Weiguo Gao, Ming Li, Lei Shi, Hanfei Zhou
arXiv:2607. 26285v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two central challenges in diffusion-based sampling are the theoretical one of understanding their remarkable effectiveness even in high-dimensional settings, and the practical one of designing algorithms with certified performance guarantees.
By Martin J. Wainwright
The paper introduces an information-theoretic measure called model information to quantify how much a diffusion model’s outputs depend on its specific training dataset. By analyzing how this measure scales with model size and dataset size, the authors identify two distinct regimes: a nonlinear regime where memorization transitions to imperfect generalization, and a linear regime where generalization improves and sample quality rises. They propose a scaling law that captures these regimes and demonstrate that it can predict memorization and sample quality beyond the fitted data range.
By Druv Pai, Dejan Stancevic, Yi Ma, Luca Ambrogioni
arXiv:2610.34834v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Clean-image prediction ($x$-prediction) and noise prediction yield equivalent population-optimal denoisers, yet can perform very differently in finite...
By Gyeonghun Kang, Pengxi Liu, Bingshuo Qian, Xiang Cheng
arXiv:2610.07655v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Discrete diffusion models have emerged as a practically successful framework for generative modeling on discrete product spaces, yet their statistica...
By Dongsun Yoon, Saptarshi Chakraborty
The paper establishes finite‑sample guarantees for fully discrete conditional diffusion models trained from data and run with a finite number of denoising steps. By aligning the score‑training objective with the sampling grid, the authors jointly analyze statistical estimation and numerical discretization errors. For any smoothness index β>0, they prove that an appropriately chosen grid yields an averaged conditional Kullback–Leibler divergence of ˗O_p(n^{-2β/(d_x+d_y+2β)}) and a total‑variation error of ˗O_p(n^{-β/(d_x+d_y+2β)}), matching known rates up to logarithmic factors.
By Qiuyun Zhu
arXiv:2607. 08757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Score matching controls average error under the forward marginals, but a discretized reverse-time sampler evaluates the learned score along its own trajectory.
By Yiwei Zhou
arXiv:2610. 12052v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite their empirical success, why diffusion models overcome the bottlenecks of classical score-based samplers remains unclear.
By Adam Perbost, Francis Bach, Pierre Marion
arXiv:2605.08392v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Practical diffusion sampling requires simulating a reverse-time ODE or SDE with a limited number of denoising steps, making the choice of sampling...
By Samuel Hurault, Thomas Moreau, Gabriel Peyr\'e
arXiv:2610. 02663v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the remarkable empirical success of flow-matching models, their statistical generalization guarantees remain underdeveloped.
By Saptarshi Chakraborty, Quentin Berthet, Peter L. Bartlett
arXiv:2602. 02908v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models trained on different, non-overlapping subsets of a dataset often produce strikingly similar outputs when given the same noise seed.
By Binxu Wang, Jacob Zavatone-Veth, Cengiz Pehlevan