arXiv:2608. 03069v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Q-Networks (DQNs) learn value functions through bootstrapped temporal-difference updates, where future returns are approximated using a greedy maximization over next-state action values.
By Lipeng Zu, Xiaonan Zhang
arXiv:2606. 29806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Action-values are foundational to many control algorithms such as Q-learning.
By Prabhat Nagarajan, Brett Daley, Martha White, Marlos C. Machado
arXiv:2608. 16182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Q-learning (DQL) has achieved remarkable empirical success in reinforcement learning, yet its training process remains notoriously unstable.
By Bozhou Chen, Yongyi Wang, Hanyu Liu, Xionghui Yang, Wenxin Li
arXiv:2606. 00350v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning requires improving a policy from fixed data while avoiding out-of-distribution actions with unreliable value estimates.
By Anas Houssaini, Mohamad H. Danesh, Amin Abyaneh, Scott Fujimoto, Hsiu-Chin Lin, David Meger
arXiv:2606. 11797v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Studies on rodents such as mice have shown the capabilities to adapt their behavior when dealing with changing parameters (``drift'') of the environment even if no information about change is provided (uncertainty) -- a behavior that can be modeled by forgetting mechanisms.
By Felix St\"orck, Fabian Hinder, Barbara Hammer
arXiv:2410.14606v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Learning from a stream of experience as it arrives, also known as streaming learning, is a core part of natural learning. However, reliable streami...
By Mohamed Elsayed, Elena Sorina Lupu, Gautham Vasan, A. Rupam Mahmood
arXiv:2608. 07335v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advancements in deep reinforcement learning have increasingly favored simplified, highly parallelized paradigms.
By Taha Shieenavaz, Shabnam Zareshahraki, Loris Nanni
arXiv:2606. 10129v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While deep Reinforcement Learning (deep-RL) has been increasingly applied to parameter control in evolutionary algorithms, rigorous theoretical analysis of parameter control remains largely restricted to single-parameter settings, owing to the difficulty of deriving effective, interpretable multi-parameter policies amenable to formal study.
By Tai Nguyen, Phong Le, Carola Doerr, Nguyen Dang
The paper introduces Space-sampled Value Decay (SsVD), a forgetting mechanism designed for non-stationary reinforcement learning where the environment can drift at every timestep. SsVD selectively pulls value estimates of randomly chosen state-space elements toward a baseline, discarding outdated information without requiring reset or change-point detection. Integrated into Soft Actor Critic and Deep Q-Networks, SsVD outperforms its base algorithms across six non-stationary environments and can also promote optimism in hard-exploration tasks.
By Felix St\"orck, Philipp Hartmann, Fabian Hinder, Klaus Neumann, Barbara Hammer
The paper introduces Q-Target Pretrained Transformers (QTPT), a method that replaces supervised behavior cloning with a Bellman-style Q‑target objective for in‑context reinforcement learning. QTPT retains the context‑conditioned Transformer architecture but learns to estimate action values using rewards and transitions from the context, rather than merely imitating offline actions. The authors provide theoretical analysis in stochastic linear bandits and finite‑horizon MDPs, demonstrating improved robustness to weak or suboptimal data, and empirically show gains over supervised pretraining on controlled RL benchmarks and extensions to D4RL Kitchen and AntMaze.
By Yichen Lin, Xuyuan Xiong, Xue Wang, Xiangfu Meng, Mike Mingcheng Wei, Tao Yao
arXiv:2506. 05716v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep Q-Networks (DQN) can suffer from overestimation bias because bootstrapped targets use a maximisation operation over noisy value estimates.
By Adrian Ly, Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew, Francisco Cruz, Sunil Aryal
arXiv:2606. 14801v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow-matching and diffusion policies are expressive action generators, but optimizing them with temporal-difference reinforcement learning (RL) remains difficult.
By Yifan Ruan, Chenyang Cao, Andreas Burger, Ali Pesaranghader, Kaveh Kamali, Jaehong Kim, Nandita Vijaykumar, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Igor Gilitschenski, Nicholas Rhinehart