arXiv:2606. 08251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Bold projections that artificial intelligence will accelerate scientific discovery have raced ahead of evidence from working scientists, and the field still lacks large-scale, scientist-in-the-loop tests of these claims.
arXiv:2608. 17270v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for scientific hypothesis generation.
arXiv:2606. 12071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are increasingly used to generate and judge scientific ideas.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for scientific hypothesis generation. However, evaluating generated hypotheses remains a challenge for trustworthy AI-enabled scientific workflows.
arXiv:2607. 28631v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI Scientist systems capable of autonomous research have the potential to significantly accelerate scientific discovery.
arXiv:2606. 25198v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous AI Research promises to accelerate the scientific progress of machine learning.
arXiv:2605. 10574v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As artificial intelligence advances, models are not improving uniformly.
arXiv:2607. 04049v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We argue that generative AI can degrade research by eroding the very practices through which scholarly judgement is formed and academic trust is built.
arXiv:2511. 06148v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are adopted into frameworks that grant them the capacity to make real decisions, it is increasingly important to ensure that they are unbiased.
arXiv:2604. 15145v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rigorous evaluation of the novelty of a scientific paper is, even for human scientists, a challenging task.
arXiv:2608. 02775v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific discovery has advanced through successive transformations in the organization of knowledge.
arXiv:2605. 28882v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the rapid advancement of large language models, evaluating human-likeness in open-ended conversation has become increasingly important.
arXiv:2606. 03763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Does scientific publishing reward the quality of ideas or the advantage of connections?