AnyAct introduces a universal action layer that consolidates diverse tool capabilities into a self‑evolving action space for AI agents operating in open‑world environments. It tackles the scale dilemma, tool non‑stationarity, and heterogeneous feedback by using hierarchical progressive retrieval and test‑time reliability evolution, while a heterogeneous observation grounding module unifies multi‑modal feedback. Evaluations on LiveMCPBench and the newly created OSMCP benchmark show state‑of‑the‑art performance, with significant gains in task success rate and reduced execution steps, especially for models with limited native capabilities.
By Lingrui Xu, Yangqin Jiang, Jiachang Zhang, Xubin Ren, Chao Huang
UniACE is a unified framework that standardizes the evaluation of large language model (LLM) agents by representing each benchmark as an instruction–tool–environment triplet and running models through a shared, task‑agnostic harness in isolated runtimes. It preserves native success criteria, offers an offline mode for dynamic‑resource tasks, and standardizes efficiency metrics, execution records, and failure attribution. Applying UniACE to 7 benchmarks across 24 domains and 15 models revealed significant score shifts, ranking reversals, and sensitivity to evidence representation, highlighting the impact of evaluation configuration on reported agent performance.
By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
The paper introduces TURTLE, an Unsupervised Environment Design framework that evolves tool‑use tasks for AI assistants by using a proposer, solver, and feedback generator powered by large language models. TURTLE automatically generates self‑tuning, long‑horizon benchmarks that increase task difficulty, diversity, and failure modes across multiple applications. Experiments on AppWorld, τ‑Bench, and AutomationBench demonstrate significant gains in hard task percentages and broader reasoning challenges.
By Hyunji Alex Nam, Michael Dennis, Natasha Jaques, Minsuk Chang
arXiv:2603. 18897v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-powered agents execute tasks through a sequential loop of model generation and tool execution.
By Yifan Sui, Han Zhao, Rui Ma, Zhiyuan He, Hao Wang, Jianxun Li, Kaiqiang Xu, Kai Chen, Yuqing Yang
arXiv:2607. 23722v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that interact with stateful environments over multiple steps: gathering hidden information, composing tool calls, and committing state changes.
By Weihuang Zheng, Tianyuan Zou, Eileen Ye, Alphet Liu, Youyong Kong, Ya-Qin Zhang, Duran Zheng, Maxm Pan
The paper introduces Harness Primitives—reusable agent harness mechanisms mined from failed task trajectories—and a framework called STITCH that selects and composes these primitives into task‑specific harnesses at test time. This approach avoids generating or debugging harness code for each task, achieving up to 12‑point gains in task success over fixed harness baselines and outperforming human‑designed harnesses like Codex CLI. STITCH also demonstrates minimal test‑time overhead (2.7%) and scales efficiently with the size of the primitive library.
By Peng Kuang, Haibo Jin, Dehao Wu, Feiyang Deng, Xiaopeng Yuan, Jerry Wang, Haohan Wang
PeakBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate how large language model agents invoke multiple tools while respecting resource constraints and parallel execution. It provides executable multi‑tool workflows with dependency annotations and measured resource profiles, and introduces a two‑part evaluation framework that separates logical planning from physical scheduling. The study shows that strong logical planning alone does not guarantee safe or efficient execution, and that providing resource information can reduce overflows and improve utilization.
By Zhi-Kai Chen, Xu-Xiang Zhong, Song-Yan Li, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv:2610.09633v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The evaluation of coding agents generally strives to be as realistic as possible. In our study, we collect 4,782 agent sessions of real software engine...
By Igor Slinko, Yaroslav Golubev, Sergey Titov
arXiv:2609.06128v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Production LLM agents execute tool-calling loops, retrieval chains, and compositional workflows in multiple modes, yet execution semantics are often co...
By Tarun Gopinath, Atul Kulkarni, Vijay Rajakumar, Shrikar Katti, Parthasarathy Govindarajen
arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.
By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran
The paper investigates how large‑language‑model (LLM) based AI agents mix latency, local resource usage, and container bottlenecks when processing user requests that involve remote LLM calls and local tool execution. By measuring three representative tasks—retrieval‑augmented question answering, web search, and software coding—the authors show that agents exhibit diverse resource dynamics, with concurrent requests revealing task‑specific bottlenecks in CPU, disk I/O, and memory. Leveraging these insights, they propose CPU‑aware tool admission and task‑aware CPU allocation, achieving up to a 5.4× speed‑up for CPU‑sensitive tasks and a 32% reduction in average latency across multiple tasks.
By Wonmi Choi, Minuk Park, Zhixiong Niu, Yongqiang Xiong, Chuck Yoo, Gyeongsik Yang
arXiv:2610.14966v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-horizon agents must complete workflows in which later activities depend on earlier outputs and changes to shared state. A key challenge for evalua...
By Yuxuan Liu, Zhaochen Su, Hangyu Guo, Shijue Huang, Zhixiong Zhang, Kawai Chung, Zhongwei Xie, Tianshi Zheng, Wei Fan, Qing Zong, Haochen Shi, Baixuan Xu, Haoran Li, Yangqiu Song