arXiv:2606.23189v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Computer-use agents (CUAs) now act on a user's behalf across personal applications such as email, calendars, and to-do lists. This cross-appl...
By Anmol Goel, Iryna Gurevych
arXiv:2607. 12406v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The capability of LLM agents to function as the ``brain'' of a system fundamentally expands the scope of analysis beyond a standalone model.
By Huihao Jing, Wenbin Hu, Shaojin Chen, Haochen Shi, Sirui Zhang, Hanyu Yang, Changxuan Fan, Zhongwei Xie, Hongyu Luo, Wun Yu Chan, Wei Fan, Haoran Li, Yangqiu Song
CIPL (Channel Inversion for Privacy Leakage) is a channel-aware framework designed to evaluate black-box privacy leakage in large language model agents. It models the leakage process through stages of sensitive source, selection, assembly, execution, observation, and extraction, assessing how selected sensitive units become attacker-recoverable outputs. Experiments across memory, retrieval, and tool-mediated targets, plus a live-agent case study, reveal that recoverability depends on factors beyond storage labels, such as observation surface, prompt alignment, retrieval depth, and provider behavior, and that a semantic audit can uncover disclosures missed by exact matching.
By Tao Huang, Guosen Wu, Guolong Zheng, Jiayang Meng, Chen Hou, Xu Yang, Xuechao Yang, Feng Xia
arXiv:2602. 11510v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems create privacy risks that current output-only benchmarks cannot measure.
By Faouzi El Yagoubi, Godwin Badu-Marfo, Ranwa Al Mallah
arXiv:2609.22949v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Existing prompt injection research focuses on single-model chatbot scenarios, where an attacker manipulates one LLM through crafted input. Multi-agen...
By Rudrendu Kumar Paul, Sourav Nandy
arXiv:2512. 16310v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly use multiple external tools to complete complex tasks.
By Yuxuan Qiao, Dongqin Liu, Hongchang Yang, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu
arXiv:2607. 18847v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems integrate LLM driven planning with interfaces to external tools, making data leakage and tool misuse feasible via instruction/data boundary failures and prompt injection attacks.
By Akansha Shukla, Emily Bellov, Parth Atulbhai Gandhi, Yuval Elovici, Asaf Shabtai
arXiv:2606. 07808v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning language models deployed in agentic workflows must follow an instruction hierarchy: when instructions from different sources conflict, the model should obey the highest-privilege applicable instruction.
By Sanjay Kariyappa, G. Edward Suh
arXiv:2607. 14611v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A growing class of agentic systems maintain persistent state across sessions through memory files, behavioral preferences, and knowledge bases.
By Soham Gadgil, David Alexander, Sai Sunku, Franziska Roesner
arXiv:2608.30207v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Computer use agents (CUAs) are vision-language models that perceive a screen and act on a real operating system through mouse, keyboard, and terminal...
By Chen Xiong, Zhiyuan He, Pin-Yu Chen, Stjepan Picek, Tsung-Yi Ho
The paper introduces skill cascading attacks, where a malicious goal is spread across multiple seemingly benign skills, causing harmful outcomes when combined. It presents SkillCascade, an automated red‑teaming framework, and releases SkillCascade‑Bench, a benchmark of 213 validated cascading test cases across various agent systems and domains. Experiments show that these cascaded interactions reliably induce harmful behaviors while evading existing per‑skill scanners and runtime monitors, revealing a gap between component‑level integrity and system‑level safety.
By Zihao Zhu, Siwei Lyu, Adel Bibi, Baoyuan Wu
arXiv:2606. 06460v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As autonomous LLM agents increasingly hold real credentials and operate infrastructure without a human in the loop, operators have no standard way to tell an agent that a resource is off-limits.
By Thamilvendhan Munirathinam