arXiv:2606. 26523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We develop a framework for interpreting AI systems as agents, drawing on the philosophical tradition of radical interpretation and the tools of mechanistic interpretability.
By Daniel A. Herrmann, Benjamin A. Levinstein
The paper argues that as Large Language Models transition from chatbots to agentic systems, the current post-hoc interpretability paradigm is insufficient for safe deployment because it cannot audit or intervene before an output is produced. It proposes a shift to generative interpretability, where a model’s inference process inherently exposes semantically meaningful checkpoints that are human-understandable and can be causally intervened upon. The authors illustrate the advantages of this approach and introduce Neuro‑Symbolic Models as a concrete implementation.
By Xiaocong Yang
arXiv:2606. 19857v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are commonly prompted and interfaced with human-readable natural language, even when the intended reader is another model.
By Jiayi Zhu, Haoxuan Peng, Junxi Wang, Liang Ke, Chen Zhang, Linfeng Zhang
arXiv:2608. 19579v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications, yet their tendency to generate toxic, harmful, or policy-violating content poses significant risks.
By Mohamed Akrout, Olivera Kotevska, Dan Wilson
arXiv:2606. 23991v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: What is an agent?
By Eric Xing, Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou
The paper extends a dynamical systems approach to classify unsafe outputs from large language models (LLMs) by projecting prompts and responses into high‑dimensional embeddings and fitting separate Koopman-based predictive models for safe and unsafe regimes. A differential residual score compares prediction errors from these models to classify new outputs. Experiments on three safety benchmarks show that including prompt embeddings improves detection of interaction‑dependent violations, especially with causal decoders like Llama‑3, while response‑only violations benefit more from dense semantic embeddings.
arXiv:2505. 24539v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a study on how and where personas -- defined by distinct sets of human characteristics, values, and beliefs -- are encoded in the representation space of large language models (LLMs).
By Celia Cintas, Miriam Rateike, Erik Miehling, Elizabeth Daly, Skyler Speakman
The paper argues that aligning large language models (LLMs) at the level of latent representations—specifically by matching their internal categorization of moral concepts to human prototype-based judgments—improves safety. Current alignment methods that focus on observable responses fail to preserve fine-grained moral categorization, leaving models vulnerable to adversarial rephrasings. By optimizing representational similarity, the authors demonstrate that LLMs can maintain more robust moral categorization and exhibit better adversarial robustness across multiple benchmarks and model sizes.
By Lingyu Li, Yan Teng, Yingchun Wang, Xia Hu
arXiv:2606. 11195v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have transformed how humans access information, but not how we reason with it.
By Rikard Rosenbacke, Carl Rosenbacke, Victor Rosenbacke, Martin McKee
arXiv:2605. 26397v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safety alignment reduces explicitly harmful outputs but inadvertently encodes a sanitized, neuronormative representation of marginalized communication.
By Naba Rizvi, Mohammed Rizvi, Harper Strickland, Saleha Ahmedi, Nedjma Ousidhoum
arXiv:2608.30428v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Strategic deception by LLM and VLM agents has emerged as a central AI alignment and safety concern. Social-deduction games (where each player holds a...
By Jaewoo Ahn, Junseo Kim, Hyunseo Kim, Heeseung Yun, Jaehyeon Son, Zsolt Kira, Gunhee Kim
arXiv:2605.27068v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Mo...
By Ye Yuan, Rui Song, Weien Li, Zeyu Li, Haochen Liu, Xiangyu Kong, Changjiang Han, Yonghan Yang, Zichen Zhao, Zixuan Dong, Fuyuan Lyu, Bowei He, Haolun Wu, Jikun Kang, Xue Liu