arXiv:2606. 19135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) advance and multi-agent systems aim to overcome the limits of standalone agents, robust communication protocols are becoming essential infrastructure for distributed agent networks.
By Linus Sander, Habtom Kahsay Gidey, Alexander Lenz, Alois Knoll
arXiv:2607. 15899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In production large language model (LLM) deployments, high API availability guarantees do not equate to conversational continuity.
By Vishal Pandey, Gopal Singh
arXiv:2608. 12371v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Stream-processing systems increasingly operate across heterogeneous mobile edge--cloud infrastructures, where workload volatility, resource contention, and stringent quality-of-service (QoS) requirements complicate decentralized scheduling.
By Sabeur Lajili, Zaki Brahmi
arXiv:2606. 05670v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Does adding more agents help an LLM workflow once compared systems share the same benchmark loader, tool access, answer contract, usage accounting, and trajectory logging?
By Yuhang Fu, Ruishan Fang, Jiaqi Shao, Huiyu Zheng, Zhengtao Zhu, Bing Luo, Tao Lin
arXiv:2606. 05158v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent reasoning systems adopt a "generate-then-transfer" paradigm that forces end-to-end latency to scale linearly with pipeline depth.
By Zhen Yang, Xiaogang Xu, Wen Wang, Cong Chen, Xander Xu, Ying-Cong Chen
arXiv:2608. 14641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic systems increasingly delegate model selection to a router, yet open-source routers are usually evaluated with different tasks, candidate pools, and execution protocols, limiting direct comparison.
By Kiran N. Kumar, Santhosh K. Saminathan
arXiv:2607. 04290v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are proposed as control interfaces for next-generation networks, but their latency, hallucinations, and lack of control guarantees make them unsuitable for near-real-time packet schedulers, especially in dynamic V2X environments.
By Gerasimos Papanikolaou-Ntais, Alexandros Kaloxylos, Athanasios Kanavos
Large Language Models (LLMs) are proposed as control interfaces for next-generation networks, but their latency, hallucinations, and lack of control guarantees make them unsuitable for near-real-time packet schedulers, especially in dynamic V2X environments. This paper introduces Agentic-V2X, an architecture where a small, locally deployed language model acts as a periodic non-real-time rApp-inspired policy creator, while a lightweight xApp-like controller executes validated policies at intervals suitable for scheduling.
arXiv:2608. 09184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents provide a promising interface for command-line-based network operations, but a plausible command may still fail or introduce operational risk after execution.
By Yuxuan Chen, Rongpeng Li, Zhifeng Zhao, Yuntao Liu, Xing Xu, Honggang Zhang
arXiv:2607. 00297v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When LLM agents use evaluator feedback to adapt their behavior in closed loops, evaluator biases propagate through the agent's strategy distribution -- a phenomenon known as evaluator preference coupling.
By Zewen Liu
arXiv:2608. 14927v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems can improve reasoning by spending more computation, but deployment requires deciding when extra collaboration is worth its cost.
By Chih-Hsuan Yang, Jingyan Jiang, Cheng-Hau Yang, Vikram Vasudevan, Huihuo Zheng, Venkatram Vishwanath, Rajeev Thakur
arXiv:2605. 27898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents, reliable assessment of their agentic capabilities has become essential.
By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao