The article titled "10 Positions for Enterprise RAG That Mainstream Tutorials Get Wrong" discusses ten key positions related to Enterprise Document Intelligence, as outlined in the series "Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol.1 #M3]. It also provides a map of every article that supports these positions.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #4bis] - A coauthor note on the brick-by-brick pitfalls that justified the four-brick split, before Part II walks the fixes The post 10 Common RAG Mistakes We Keep Seeing in Production appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #M1] - The thesis behind every architectural choice in this series The post Amplify the Expert: A Philosophy for Building Enterprise RAG appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #7ter] - Six positions on the retrieval brick that contradict the cosine-first reflex of mainstream RAG The post The Untaught Lessons of RAG Retrieval: Cosine Is Not the Foundation appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6ter] - Six positions on the question-parsing brick that contradict the mainstream RAG playbook The post The Untaught Lessons of RAG Question Parsing: Structure Before You Search appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article explains that enterprise document intelligence can be categorized into three distinct corpus types, each requiring a specific architecture. It outlines how to determine the shape of a document collection through three key questions. The piece also discusses the costs associated with building a system for the incorrect corpus type.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6bis] - Ask one focused clarification, learn the default from the answer, stay silent next time The post When RAG Users Ask Vague Questions: Clarify Once, Learn the Default appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #1] The smallest version of RAG that actually works, on a real PDF, with grounded answers and the source lines highlighted.
The article "How Does a RAG Reranker Really Work?" explores the inner workings of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) rerankers, focusing on how data scientists explain the model’s operations behind the scenes. It discusses the impact of these insights on architecture decisions within enterprise document intelligence, specifically in the context of Enterprise Document Intelligence Vol.1 #2D. The piece highlights the importance of transparent model explanations for effective enterprise RAG implementation.
The article discusses the importance of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system providing clear evidence when it states that information is not present in a document. It outlines four distinct types of evidence that should accompany such a claim to avoid presenting a confident but incorrect answer or an unsupported “no answer.” The piece emphasizes that each evidence type serves as a safeguard against misinformation in enterprise document intelligence.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #9B] - One call wires the four upgraded bricks together, run on a paper, a NIST standard, and a report with a broken TOC The post A Production RAG Pipeline in Action: Every Answer Typed and Cited appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #3] - Why the ML toolkit (hyperparameter sweeps, train/test splits, explainability frameworks) solves the wrong problem, and what to use instead The post RAG Is Not Machine Learning, and the ML Toolkit Solves the Wrong Problem appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article titled "An Introduction to Jev" discusses an AI system that focuses on making decisions rather than generating text. It highlights Jev’s unique approach to decision-making within the broader context of AI development. The piece was originally published on Towards Data Science.