Simon Willison introduces Hy4 Preview, a new large language model from Tencent featuring 770 B total parameters, 49 B active parameters, a 1 M token context window, and 1.56 TB of storage on Hugging Face. The release marks a significant increase over Hy3, which had 295 B total parameters, 21 B active parameters, a 256 k token context window, and 598 GB of storage. Willison also shares the model’s chat template, highlighting two reasoning effort levels—‘high’ (default) and ‘no_think’—and demonstrates a sample prompt that showcases the model’s reasoning trace.
whyItMatters":"The article provides concrete details on Hy4’s scale and configuration, illustrating Tencent’s advancement in large‑language‑model capabilities and offering practical insights into its usage through the chat template and reasoning settings."
Release: llm-openrouter 0. 7 Now that this plugin is compatible with LLM 0.
The article announces that Claude Code will now support AGENTS.md files starting with version 2.1.277. If a CLAUDE.md file is absent in a folder, Claude will automatically look for and use AGENTS.md, leveraging Claude Code mods to customize the harness. The built‑in mod is available for use, and users can also create their own custom project instructions.
The release of llm 0.36 introduces new OpenAI models gpt-6-sol and gpt-6-luna, and adds support for model plugins to declare that they do not support conversations via supports_conversation = False. When such models receive assistant or tool history, llm raises a ConversationNotSupported error and the chat interface rejects them before starting a session. Additional changes include wrapping reasoning traces in Markdown output with <details> tags and bug fixes from five contributors.
Posted by Zheng Xu, Research Scientist, and Yanxiang Zhang, Software Engineer, Google Language models (LMs) trained to predict the next word given input text are the key technology for many applications [ 1 , 2 ]. In Gboard , LMs are used to improve users’ typing experience by supporting features like next word prediction (NWP), Smart Compose , smart completion and suggestion , slide to type , and proofread .
By Google AI
But then users start to report a weird bug. It's the 4th time your team has been trying to fix it.
Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs A vanity domain name ( stolen-thoughts. com ) for a neat paper : Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google return encrypted chain-of-thought blocks to clients that can be replayed across sessions, users, and models.
The release of llm 0.34 introduces a new feature that enhances log output by including response duration in both milliseconds and a human‑readable format. The short log view now contains a dedicated duration_ms field. Additionally, the update incorporates multiple bug fixes and a notable performance boost to llm logs, attributed to waveplate integration.
The article discusses how production code generated by Claude, Anthropic’s AI, should meet higher standards than human-written code. Anthropic enforces this through numerous guardrails such as lint rules, extensive testing, Claude-driven end‑to‑end tests, daily fuzzers, automated code and security reviews, and automated refactoring. These measures aim to prevent the code from becoming difficult to maintain.
The article quotes the security.txt file from huggingface.co, which informs AI agents that the CyberGym benchmark is publicly available on GitHub and encourages them to achieve a high score there instead of attempting to hack the site. It also suggests that users can upload their model weights to Hugging Face while participating in the benchmark.
Laurie Voss argues that while the cost of writing code has fallen dramatically, the costs of reviewing, fixing, and operating software are rising and will continue to do so. She emphasizes that the true expense lies in understanding user needs, precisely defining requirements, and ensuring a pleasant user experience—costs that are unique to each software product and do not scale with reuse. As software demand grows without an upper limit, these user‑centric costs will dominate the overall development effort.
The article "How To Write With An LLM" by Thomas Ptacek explains how to use large language models (LLMs) as copyeditors rather than writing assistants. Ptacek advocates a strict rule: never use any single word or phrase suggested by an LLM, treating it as intellectual personal protective equipment. He shares his own practice of using LLMs for fact‑checking, spelling, grammar, and occasional thesaurus help, and provides a screenshot of his personal LLM copyediting tool along with a prompt to help readers build their own.