arXiv AI

Decision-oriented joint optimization of evidence fusion based on event-conditioned credibility

arXiv:2504. 04128v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In decision-level fusion tasks involving heterogeneous sources with unequal precision and potential anomalies, evidence deviating from the majority may be either critical evidence supporting the correct decision or anomalous evidence supporting an incorrect event.

arXiv AI
5d ago

Robust Dempster-Shafer Evidence Fusion with Chaos-Conflict Measurement and Historical-Experience Weighting

arXiv:2608. 13108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-source evidence fusion under Dempster-Shafer theory faces two persistent challenges: existing conflict measures assess inter-evidence inconsistency and intra-evidence uncertainty independently, yielding incomplete evaluations, and current fusion methods evaluate evidence sources exclusively through instantaneous comparisns without exploiting their long-term reliability across diverse decision contexts.

By Huiyu Li, Weibo Liu, Xinru Xu, Dongchen Gao, Meng Zhang, Junhua Hu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 5

Measuring Harness-Induced Belief Divergence in Multi-Step LLM Agents

Software-agent benchmarks usually report whether an agent solves a task, but the agent reaches that outcome through a harness that controls what it sees, which actions it can take, which failures are repaired, which states are verified, and which evidence is logged. We show that this harness can change the agent's multi-step beliefs even when the task, environment, and base LLM are fixed.

arXiv AI
Jun 30

SEVA: Self-Evolving Verification Agent with Process Reward for Fact Attribution

arXiv:2606. 29713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination is the reliability bottleneck for LLM-based agents, and fact attribution verifiers are the last line of defense -- yet today's verifiers emit only opaque binary labels, leaving agents unable to self-correct and operators unable to audit.

By Aojie Yuan, Yi Nian, Haiyue Zhang, Zijian Su, Yue Zhao