Perturbative Contrastive Physical Learning
arXiv:2606. 09756v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Responses to perturbations are key to understanding physical systems.
arXiv:2608. 11585v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physical computing systems exploit device dynamics for computation, but their gradient-based optimization is challenging: backpropagation through a digital twin suffers from model-reality gap.
arXiv:2606. 09756v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Responses to perturbations are key to understanding physical systems.
arXiv:2606. 27029v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Hamiltonian Neural Networks (HNNs) integrate physical priors into neural models by learning a system's Hamiltonian, improving generalization and sample efficiency.
arXiv:2606. 27029v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hamiltonian Neural Networks (HNNs) integrate physical priors into neural models by learning a system's Hamiltonian, improving generalization and sample efficiency.
arXiv:2607. 16177v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently emerged as a promising feedback control strategy for nonlinear and complex dynamical systems.
arXiv:2606. 00716v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inference and control in engineered physical systems pay a heavy physics cost at deployment: state estimators, inverse-problem solvers, model-predictive controllers, schedulers, and observers are often not closed-form and must re-solve a numerical optimization per instance, with the operator re-supplied each time.
arXiv:2608.24049v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators provide efficient surrogates for spatiotemporal PDE systems, but purely data-driven formulations often accumulate substantial errors d...
arXiv:2609.05808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In situ adjoint training extracts parameter gradients directly from measurement, but has so far been limited to reciprocal or restricted systems. Her...
arXiv:2606. 15053v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Surrogate models are central to scientific machine learning, where they enable fast prediction, simulation, inference, and control for complex physical systems.
Differentiable simulation is a key component in learning, control, and inverse problems, where gradients through nonlinear implicit solvers are required. Existing approaches either rely on unrolled automatic differentiation, whose memory grows with solver depth, or on equation-level implicit differentiation, which assembles global Jacobians and solves large sparse adjoint systems, discarding the locality of the forward solver -- and differentiating the converged equation rather than the finite computation that actually ran.
arXiv:2602. 03670v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Equilibrium Propagation (EP) is a physics-inspired learning algorithm that uses stationary states of a dynamical system both for inference and learning.
The paper presents a method for training single‑step neural surrogates that can handle wave‑scattering inverse problems with tens of thousands of controllable variables. By dynamically generating training examples through gradient ascent and using a replay dataset with normalization, the authors achieve a surrogate that accurately models two‑dimensional wave scattering for up to 41,772 variables and can generalize to over 3 million variables without retraining. The surrogate demonstrates comparable or better performance than traditional FDTD simulations for large‑scale forward simulations and inverse design of photonic devices, achieving speedups up to 26.5×.
The paper introduces the Physics-Informed Stochastic Configuration Machine (PI‑SCM), a backpropagation‑free neural network designed for solving nonlinear differential equations. By analytically evaluating local Jacobians, PI‑SCM linearizes the physical loss, enabling optimal weight determination through generalized linear least squares and avoiding iterative nonlinear optimization. The authors present a progressive algorithmic suite—PI‑SC‑I, PI‑SC‑II, and PI‑SC‑III—prove their universal approximation properties, and show through experiments that PI‑SCM achieves high‑fidelity predictions and parameter identification while accelerating training by orders of magnitude compared to standard PINNs.