arXiv Machine Learning

Follow the Perturbed Leader for Linear Bandits: $\sqrt{T}$ Regret over General Action Sets

arXiv Machine Learning
3d ago

Follow the Perturbed Leader for Linear Bandits: $\sqrt{T}$ Regret over General Convex Sets

The paper presents the first adversarial linear bandit algorithm based on Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) that achieves √T regret over general convex action sets. It achieves a regret of ≥O(d^{5/4}√T) using only linear optimization oracles, and a near‑optimal ≥O(d√T) regret when an optimal‑design exploration distribution is available. The work improves on previous FTPL algorithms and generalizes earlier results for special action sets, offering a simpler and more computationally efficient approach that relies on adaptive perturbation distributions and a new analysis framework based on Fisher information.

By Chen-Yu Wei
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Bandit PCA with Minimax Optimal Regret

arXiv:2607. 10936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the bandit-feedback version of online principal component analysis (Bandit PCA): in each round $t = 1,\dots,T$, the adversary selects a $d \times d$ symmetric gain matrix $G_t$ with spectrum in $[0,1]$ and rank at most $r$; the learner simultaneously selects a unit vector $w_t \in S^{d-1}$ and receives the reward $w_t^\top G_t w_t$.

By Mo\"ise Blanchard, Dmitrii Ostrovskii, Aadirupa Saha
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Self-Concordant Perturbations for Linear Bandits

arXiv:2510. 24187v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider the adversarial linear bandits setting and present a unified algorithmic framework that bridges Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) and Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) methods, extending the known connection between them from the full-information setting.

By Lucas L\'evy, Jean-Lou Valeau, Arya Akhavan, Patrick Rebeschini
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Nonlinear Bandit

arXiv:2607. 07304v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper we first study the problem of generalized linear bandit (GLB) under heavy-tailed noise.

By Tianshuo Zheng, Ting Wu, Zhi-Hua Zhou, Keqin Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 3

Parameter-Free Heavy-Tailed Bandits

arXiv:2607. 29460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heavy-tailed distributions arise naturally in sequential decision-making problems such as financial investment, online advertising, and network management, where rare but extreme outcomes can dominate performance.

By Gianmarco Genalti, Alberto Maria Metelli
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Asymptotic Optimality of Thompson Sampling for Risk-Averse Bandits with Sub-Gaussian Rewards

arXiv:2606. 09191v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We prove that $\rho\text{-}\mathrm{NPTS}_{\mathrm{SG}}$, an anchor-free nonparametric Thompson Sampling algorithm for risk-averse bandits, achieves regret matching the instance-dependent lower bound to leading order in $\log n$, establishing it as asymptotically optimal for any continuous risk functional $\rho$ (CVaR, mean-variance, Sharpe ratio, distortion risk measures, and more) on the class of distributions with bounded density and sub-Gaussian tails, including Gaussian arms.

By Joel Q. L. Chang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Satisficing Regret Minimization in Bandits: Constant Rate and Light-Tailed Distribution

The paper introduces SELECT, an algorithmic framework for satisficing regret minimization in bandit problems, achieving constant expected satisficing regret when a satisficing arm exists. A variant, SELECT‑LITE, further ensures a light‑tailed satisficing regret distribution while maintaining constant expected regret in the realizable case and sub‑linear standard regret otherwise. Experiments on synthetic data and a real‑world dynamic pricing scenario demonstrate the practical effectiveness of both algorithms.

By Qing Feng, Tianyi Ma, Ruihao Zhu
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

High-Probability Regret Bounds for Feel-Good Thompson Sampling

The paper presents the first high‑probability regret bounds for both cumulative and current‑step variants of Feel‑Good Thompson Sampling (FGTS) in contextual bandits with general realizable function approximation. The bounds rely on decoupling coefficients and prior mass near the true reward function, and in the linear setting they achieve ≠d√T log(2T)+√T log(1/δ) regret with probability at least 1‑δ. This matches the dimension and horizon dependence of upper‑confidence‑bound algorithms up to logarithmic factors, while the high‑probability cost adds only linear dependence on log(1/δ).

By Xuheng Li, Qingyue Zhao, Quanquan Gu