Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for mathematical reasoning suffers from a structural blind spot: on "cliff" prompts-those on which every sampled rollout in a group fails-the group-normalized advantage is identically zero, so GRPO produces no gradient on precisely the prompts at the frontier of the model's capability. We introduce LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO), a sampling-time mechanism that recovers this lost gradient.
arXiv:2607. 27787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for mathematical reasoning suffers from a structural blind spot: on "cliff" prompts-those on which every sampled rollout in a group fails-the group-normalized advantage is identically zero, so GRPO produces no gradient on precisely the prompts at the frontier of the model's capability.
By Ken Ding
Group Adaptive Clipping Policy Optimization (GAPO) is a plug‑in modification to GRPO methods that adapts the importance‑sampling clipping boundary based on rollout advantage. By allowing rollouts with larger learning signals to receive proportionally greater update headroom, GAPO addresses the limitation of fixed clipping that suppresses rare but informative rollouts. Experiments on Qwen and Llama models show that GAPO consistently improves Pass@1 and Pass@k on math reasoning and coding benchmarks where base model pass rates are low.
By Sheng Jia, Xiao Wang, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Rein Houthooft
arXiv:2601. 03895v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a popular algorithm for reinforcement learning with large language models (LLMs).
By Chi Liu, Xin Chen
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) assigns a magnitude to each rollout based on within‑group reward statistics, rewarding rollouts that reach the correct answer through reasoning. However, the same magnitude can be high for rollouts that reach the answer by guessing, creating a spurious advantage that misleads the policy toward guess‑like behaviors. The paper identifies three scenarios where this occurs—bounded‑answer tasks, open‑answer sets with bounded sub‑cases, and search agents with many paths to the same answer—and proposes SIGNBALANCE, a composition‑free magnitude that preserves the verifier sign, uses a global scale, and restores zero‑mean balance via stop‑gradient per‑class rescaling, matching GRPO on open‑answer math and improving on bounded‑answer math and search agents.
By Jiamian Wang, Samyadeep Basu, Koustava Goswami, Tong Yu, Zhiqiang Tao
arXiv:2610.20497v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) trains language models from checked task outcomes, but assigning a terminal reward to individual...
By Wei Chen, Yubing Wu, Zhou Xu, Haoyue Zhang, Delu Zeng, Jiahao Wang, Junmei Yang, Pan tiewen, Jingfeng Liu, Zhiheng Zhou, Bo Li, Min Chen
arXiv:2607. 26253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is bottlenecked by rollout generation, yet many sampled prompts produce saturated groups (all responses correct or all incorrect) whose zero reward variance yields no policy-gradient signal.
By Pixel Nomand, Elena Voss, Marcus Hale, Sofia Reyes
ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning proposes a new approach to improve language‑model reasoning by addressing the inefficiencies of independent stochastic rollouts. By framing credit assignment as a Stochastic Shortest Path problem, ReAPO modifies GRPO to allocate more generation to failed trajectories, reinforcing successful retries without rewarding failures. Experiments on Qwen3 and OLMo‑2 models across eight mathematical and scientific benchmarks show that ReAPO outperforms GRPO and other baselines, achieving higher first‑attempt accuracy and reducing generated tokens needed to reach peak performance.
By Nghi Dao, Calder Morton-Ferguson, Noah Golowich, Adam Block
arXiv:2607. 26862v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a standard reinforcement learning method for post-training language models.
By Junoh Park, Junseo Hwang, Wonguk Cho, Taesup Kim
arXiv:2608. 03467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) com- monly optimizes each correct completion as an independent learning signal.
By Zhe Cao, Miaowen Wen, Fangjiong Chen
The paper critiques the common reinforcement‑learning approach of sampling tool subsets when the full set of tools is enumerable, showing that sampling leads to degraded policy estimates and increased reward sparsity in genomic reasoning tasks. It proposes Full‑Group Policy Optimization (FGPO), which evaluates every tool subset and precomputes rewards in a table, thereby eliminating the need for frozen‑reasoner calls during training. Experiments across five frozen reasoners and three genomic benchmarks demonstrate that FGPO consistently outperforms GRPO, improving average scores by 6.75 points and reducing the number of invoked tools per question.
By Haoyue Liu, Xiaoyu Ma, Ye Chen, Zhichao Wang, Xiaoying Tang
arXiv:2610.09804v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning is now central to eliciting reasoning in large language models, while in the popular algorithm Group Relative Policy Optimizatio...
By Yingxiang Yang, Weihang Xiao, Zhunxuan Wang, Joshua Flashner, Niresh Agarwal