arXiv:2607. 14114v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph learning under distribution shift presents a persistent challenge, where models adapt to new graphs with limited or even no supervision.
By Haohua Niu, Xingtong Yu, Yang Liu, Junfeng Fang, Xuanting Xie, Jie Tan, Zhongjian Zhang, Hong Cheng, Yuan Fang
arXiv:2604. 12503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various tasks but remain prone to hallucinations in knowledge-intensive scenarios.
By Shuai Wang, Xixi Wang, Yinan Yu
arXiv:2606. 15633v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for reasoning over Text-Attributed Graphs (TAGs).
By Donald Loveland, Puja Trivedi, Ari Weinstein, Edward W Huang, Danai Koutra
arXiv:2606. 19351v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning infers new knowledge from existing facts and is widely applied in question answering, recommendation, and decision support.
By Xinyan Zhu, Yaoqi Liu, Yue Gao, Huadong Ma, Cheng Yang, Chuan Shi
arXiv:2608. 12391v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph reasoning provides a promising testbed for evaluating the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), as graph instances can be programmatically generated, structurally controlled, and naturally scaled to long-input settings.
By Fali Wang, Ali Al-Lawati, Iliyas Bektas, Jinxuan Fang, Alek Melenski, Tianxiang Zhao, Yao Ma, Suhang Wang
arXiv:2606. 15633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for reasoning over Text-Attributed Graphs (TAGs).
By Donald Loveland, Puja Trivedi, Ari Weinstein, Edward W Huang, Danai Koutra
KGFR introduces a Knowledge Graph Foundation Retriever that collaborates with large language models to enhance knowledge‑intensive question answering. By encoding relations with LLM‑generated descriptions and initializing entities from question roles, KGFR enables zero‑shot generalization to unseen knowledge graphs. Its Asymmetric Progressive Propagation technique efficiently handles large graphs, while a controllable reasoning loop allows the LLM to request candidate answers, supporting facts, and reasoning paths.
By Yuanning Cui, Zequn Sun, Wei Hu, Zhangjie Fu
arXiv:2607. 17266v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing.
By Peiji Yu, Xin Chen, Tianxing Wu
arXiv:2608. 03292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long Document Visual Question Answering (LongDocVQA) requires Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to locate, integrate, and reason over heterogeneous document elements distributed across multiple pages.
By Le Xiang, Zhicheng Guan, Hong Chen, Xiaocong Lin, Zhenghua Lei, Teng Hu, Bolei He, Long Zeng
arXiv:2606. 08831v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly perform multi-step reasoning, where intermediate claims form implicit directed acyclic graphs whose node correctness is structurally conditioned on their ancestors.
By Ting Wang, Yuanjie Shi, Yan Yan, Huan Zhang
arXiv:2602. 16512v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Prompting schemes such as Chain of Thought, Tree of Thoughts, and Graph of Thoughts can significantly enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
By Felix Fricke, Simon Malberg, Georg Groh
The paper investigates when intermediate reasoning traces benefit machine translation by examining models, languages, domains, and datasets. It finds that the optimal reasoning language depends on the model, reasoning length has a non‑monotonic effect on quality, and traces display recurring functional patterns. Using Hierarchical Meta‑Summarization, the authors uncover a shared structure of understanding/planning, translating/drafting, and refining/verifying, while also noting domain‑specific variations, suggesting that reasoning should be tailored rather than uniformly applied.
By Yuxiang Liu, Jiaming Luo, Eleftheria Briakou, Colin Cherry