arXiv:2606. 02624v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI for scientific discovery is entering an agentic era, where protein-engineering systems are expected to prioritize future wet-lab experiments rather than merely fit static measurements.
arXiv:2609.37808v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Protein optimization aims to discover high-fitness sequences under a limited experimental budget. Existing machine-learning methods use task-specific p...
PFArena is a new benchmark for evaluating language models in protein modification tasks, featuring four controlled interfaces that span single‑mutant generation and multi‑mutant ranking. It incorporates varying levels of mutation fitness data to represent four research scenarios with different amounts of prior experimental context. The benchmark tests six protein language models, six large language models, and five LLM‑based agents, finding that PLMs excel at open‑ended single‑mutant generation while LLMs and agents perform best in multi‑mutant ranking when target‑specific data are available, yet all struggle as search space and mutation depth grow.
arXiv:2507. 08920v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce AMix-1, a powerful protein foundation model built on Bayesian Flow Networks and empowered by a systematic training methodology, encompassing pretraining scaling laws, emergent capability analysis, in-context learning mechanism, and test-time scaling algorithm.
arXiv:2609.05818v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce ABLE, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents' ability to use biological AI models (BAIMs), such as ProteinMPNN and AlphaFold3, in dual-use...
arXiv:2509. 26405v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce InVirtuoGen, a discrete flow generative model for fragmented SMILES for de novo and fragment-constrained generation, and target-property/lead optimization of small molecules.
arXiv:2602. 02905v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) promise to accelerate scientific discovery end-to-end, but rigorously evaluating their capacity for verifiable discovery remains a central challenge.
arXiv:2605. 06177v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reproducing and comparing deep research agents today is hard: the same backbone evaluated on the same benchmark can report different accuracies across papers because the harness and tool registry differ, and integrating a new model into a comparable evaluation surface costs weeks of model-specific engineering.
Protein modification requires navigating an immense sequence space, yet wet-lab validation remains low-throughput and costly. Although computational paradigms including protein language models (PLMs),...
arXiv:2601. 21800v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce BioAgent Bench, an evaluation suite designed for measuring the performance and robustness of AI agents in common bioinformatics tasks.
AgentFold is a multi‑agent framework that treats protein‑folding model design as a closed‑loop search over executable code variants. Starting from the ESMFold codebase, the agents generate hypotheses, modify and debug code, evaluate model variants, and store both successes and failures in structured memory, guided by an MCTS‑style policy that allocates GPU resources. In an engineering‑scale experiment, AgentFold explored about 80 variants using 5,000 GPU‑hours and 170 million LLM tokens, improving the best lDDT score by 7.5% over independent Codex proposals and outperforming a random‑search baseline, while also uncovering empirical design patterns such as the benefits of early, soft, learnable priors.
arXiv:2603. 03322v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable potential in automatic knowledge discovery.
The paper introduces AssayBench-Loop, a large benchmark of 1,389 CRISPR screens across five phenotype categories, and builds on it to develop AssayLoop, a sequential experimental design framework that combines a transformer-based acquisition policy (AssayFormer) trained on historical data with LLM-derived biological priors. AssayLoop achieves a 5.67‑fold enrichment over random selection, recovering 27.7% of hits after testing only about 5% of the library, and outperforms existing adaptive-design methods and standalone LLMs. The authors also present AssayLLM, extending the approach directly to an LLM via task‑specific post‑training, and show that performance improves with more historical training data and transfers to unseen phenotype categories.