arXiv Machine Learning

Evaluating Universal Machine Learning Force Fields Against Experimental Measurements

arXiv:2508. 05762v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Universal machine learning force fields (UMLFFs) promise to revolutionize materials science by enabling rapid atomistic simulations across the periodic table.

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 18

Robust and Interpretable Adaptation of Equivariant Materials Foundation Models via Sparsity-promoting Fine-tuning

arXiv:2606. 18691v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-trained materials foundation models, or machine learning interatomic potentials, leverage general physicochemical knowledge to effectively approximate potential energy surfaces.

By Youngwoo Cho, Seunghoon Yi, Wooil Yang, Sungmo Kang, Young-woo Son, Jaegul Choo, Joonseok Lee, Soo Kyung Kim, Hongkee Yoon

fine-tuning efficiency benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Sep 10

Synthesizability Prediction of Crystalline Structures with Structure-Aware Feature Learning and Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv:2510.19251v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting which hypothetical inorganic crystals can be experimentally realized remains a central challenge in accelerating materials discove...

By Danial Ebrahimzadeh, Sarah Sharif, Yaser Mike Banad

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 17

Full-data accuracy with fewer labels for training and fine-tuning machine-learning force fields

arXiv:2607. 14486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) are reliable only near their training distribution, making efficient construction of diverse training sets a major bottleneck for both train-from-scratch and foundation fine-tuning workflows.

By Sheng Bi, Yi-Ze Wang, Jun Cheng

fine-tuning

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 16

Distilling latent electrostatics from foundation machine learning interatomic potentials

arXiv:2606. 15001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have enabled atomistic simulations across broad regions of chemical and materials space, but many remain computationally expensive and lack explicit electrostatics, limiting their use for systems governed by long-range interactions and electrical response.

By Xiaoyu Wang, Bingqing Cheng

fine-tuning efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 17

Benchmarking data-driven material models on the classic Treloar dataset

arXiv:2608. 14063v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning is rapidly reshaping constitutive modeling, offers new ways to learn material behavior directly from experimental data, and challenges long-established modeling paradigms.

By Hagen Holthusen, Moritz Flaschel, Denisa Martonov\'a, Ellen Kuhl

benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

2d ago

Surprisingly High Redundancy in Electronic Structure Data Across Materials Explained by Low Intrinsic Dimensionality

arXiv:2507.09001v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) models for electronic structure typically rely on large datasets generated by computationally expensive Kohn-Sham densi...

By Sazzad Hossain, Ponkrshnan Thiagarajan, Shashank Pathrudkar, Stephanie Taylor, Abhijeet S. Gangan, Amartya S. Banerjee, Susanta Ghosh

efficiency benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 13

Active rejection enables reliable generalization of universal machine-learning interatomic potentials

arXiv:2607. 09456v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Universal machine learning interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) bridge quantum-mechanical accuracy and large-scale molecular dynamics, but the cost of high-accuracy calculations such as r$^2$SCAN limits training to datasets that remain small relative to the open materials space.

By Mingxiang Luo, Xinnan Mao, Lu Wang, Lei Bai, Feng Ding, Yuqiang Li

benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 1

ElemeNet: Multiscale Molecular Machine Learning with Uncertainty Quantification Across the Periodic Table

arXiv:2606. 30961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in deep learning architectures and representations have enabled ML-driven chemical property prediction, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models have remained largely confined to independent codebases and lack support for diverse chemical species.

By Jacob W. Toney, Samir Darouich, Yiran Wang, Aaron G. Garrison, Johannes K\"astner, Heather J. Kulik

llms benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 8

Multi-objective optimization and quantum hybridization of equivariant deep learning interatomic potentials

arXiv:2602. 16908v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Allegro is a machine learning interatomic potential model designed to predict atomic properties in molecules using E(3) equivariant neural networks.

By G. Laskaris, D. Morozov, D. Tarpanov, A. Seth, J. Procelewska, G. Sai Gautam, A. Sagingalieva, R. Brasher, A. Melnikov

arXiv Machine Learning

2d ago

A strategic roadmap for an atomistic machine-learning ecosystem

arXiv:2609.39090v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven machine learning (ML) techniques have become an essential tool in many domains of science. Their application to atomistic simulations of...

By J\"org Behler, Michele Ceriotti, Cecilia Clementi, G\'abor Cs\'anyi, Alin-Marin Elena, Aditi Krishnapriyan, Joseph W. Abbott, Fabio Affinito, Albert P. Bart\'ok, Ilyes Batatia, Filippo Bigi, Florian N. Br\"unig, Yannick Calvino Alonso, Giuseppe Carleo, Aur\'elie Champagne, Stefan Chmiela, Marc L. Descoteaux, Ralf Drautz, Alexandra Farcas, Meng Gao, Rohit Goswami, Michael F. Herbst, Christian Holm, James R. Kermode, Alexander L. M. Knoll, Tobias Kreiman, Hoang-Thien Luu, Yury Lysogorskiy, Mihai-Cosmin Marinica, Rocco Meli, Klaus-Robert M\"uller, Frank No\'e, Mohamadhosein Nosratjoo, Simon Olsson, Christoph Ortner, Aldo S. Pasos-Trejo, Anyang Peng, Eric Qu, Andrea Rizzi, Mariana Rossi, Bassem Sboui, Gregor N. C. Simm, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Jacopo Venturin, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, William C. Witt, Brandon M. Wood, Tigany Zarrouk, Fabian Zills

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 9

Inverse design of bespoke interatomic potentials via active learning by information-matching

arXiv:2606. 08148v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interatomic potentials (IPs) enable large-scale atomistic simulations beyond the reach of first-principles methods, but their predictive reliability depends critically on the selection of training data, quantified uncertainty, and model expressiveness.

By Yonatan Kurniawan (Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA), Logan D. Williams (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA), Amit Samanta (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA), Ilia Nikiforov (Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Daniel Schwalbe-Koda (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA), Mark K. Transtrum (Cross Stream Consulting, Springville, UT, USA), Ellad B. Tadmor (Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Vincenzo Lordi (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA), Vasily V. Bulatov (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA)

arXiv AI

Sep 17

BOOM: Benchmarking Out-Of-distribution Molecular Property Predictions of Machine Learning Models

BOOM is a new benchmark for evaluating out‑of‑distribution (OOD) molecular property predictions in machine learning. It provides chemically‑informed tests across common property prediction tasks and assesses over 150 model‑task combinations. The study shows that current models, including chemical foundation models, struggle to generalize OOD, with the best model still exhibiting three times higher error than in‑distribution predictions.

By Evan R. Antoniuk, Shehtab Zaman, Tal Ben-Nun, Peggy Li, James Diffenderfer, Busra Sahin, Obadiah Smolenski, Everett Grethel, Tim Hsu, Anna M. Hiszpanski, Kenneth Chiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Brian Van Essen

benchmarks safety

Related stories