The paper investigates where failures occur in GNN‑based Knowledge Graph Question Answering pipelines when faced with adversarial question perturbations. By isolating stages—entity linking, subgraph retrieval, GNN reasoning, and answer generation—and applying two answer‑preserving attacks (Compositional Restructuring and Relation Synonym Swap), the authors find that subgraph construction is responsible for over 99% of end‑to‑end failures, even though the correct answer is often present in the retrieved subgraph. This challenges the assumption that reasoning models are the weak link and highlights subgraph construction as the critical mitigation target.
arXiv:2606. 00328v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for knowledge base question answering (KBQA), where answering requires selecting entities from a question-specific knowledge-graph subgraph.
FedV-KGQA addresses multi‑hop question answering over vertically partitioned knowledge graphs where each silo holds disjoint relation types. The system trains local embeddings, concatenates silo‑specific entity views, anchors questions at a topic entity, and ranks candidates without sharing raw triples. Experiments show federated fusion nearly matches centralized accuracy, that anchoring and enrichment are more critical than embedding choice, and that the cheapest encoder depends on target accuracy.
arXiv:2608.22762v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) is a key task for evaluating KG-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs), and complex KGQA that requires multi-...
The paper introduces Constrained Entity Selection under Partial Knowledge (CES-PK), a framework for improving large language model (LLM) based knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) by filtering candidate answers with lightweight symbolic constraints instead of full semantic parsing. CES-PK uses a three-valued constraint semantics—satisfied, violated, unknown—to handle incomplete knowledge graphs and avoid incorrect rejections under open‑world assumptions. Experiments on the Hetionet biomedical knowledge graph show that applying type, relation, and exclusion constraints increases precision while preserving recall, and that satisfied constraints can be used to rank remaining candidates.
arXiv:2610.06650v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Wikidata is one of the largest open knowledge bases, yet answering a complex question over it still requires a SPARQL query that names the right en...
KGFR introduces a Knowledge Graph Foundation Retriever that collaborates with large language models to enhance knowledge‑intensive question answering. By encoding relations with LLM‑generated descriptions and initializing entities from question roles, KGFR enables zero‑shot generalization to unseen knowledge graphs. Its Asymmetric Progressive Propagation technique efficiently handles large graphs, while a controllable reasoning loop allows the LLM to request candidate answers, supporting facts, and reasoning paths.
arXiv:2608. 04519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarking machine unlearning methods is critical to understand whether sensitive knowledge is removed from large language models (LLMs) or not.
Benchmarking machine unlearning methods is critical to understand whether sensitive knowledge is removed from large language models (LLMs) or not. Current unlearning benchmarks include mainly single-hop questions and a narrow set of multi-hop questions.
arXiv:2604. 12503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various tasks but remain prone to hallucinations in knowledge-intensive scenarios.
arXiv:2606. 28076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) aims to answer natural-language questions by reasoning over structured facts.
arXiv:2603.28773v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet factually incorrect content when used for language generation (a phenomenon of...
arXiv:2606. 00686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The prevailing paradigm in large language model (LLM) alignment operates via erasure, filtering unsafe data or training models to strictly refuse harmful prompts.