arXiv Machine Learning

Deep-learning-based low-energy trigger algorithms for the Hyper-Kamiokande experiment

The paper presents deep‑learning trigger algorithms for the Hyper‑Kamiokande water Cherenkov detector, targeting low‑energy neutrino events below 7 MeV. It compares a supervised neural‑network classifier with two anomaly‑detection methods—an autoencoder and a Manifold Projection‑Diffusion Recovery model—showing the supervised model achieves a 76.7 % signal efficiency for 3 MeV electrons, far surpassing the 26.4 % efficiency of a traditional hit‑count trigger. GPU‑based runtime tests indicate per‑window inference latencies well below one millisecond.

arXiv AI
Jun 16

JetParticle-JEPA: An Efficient Self-Supervised Representation Learning method for Jet Tagging in High-Energy Physics

arXiv:2606. 14813v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Jet tagging at the Large Hadron Collider increasingly relies on deep learning models trained on massive simulated datasets, leading to high computational costs and limited robustness to detector mismodeling.

By Guillaume Letellier (LPCC), Antonin Vacheret (LPCC), Fr\'ed\'eric Jurie
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 2

Panda Diplomacy: Foundation Model Pre-training across Particle Imaging Detectors for High Energy and Nuclear Physics

Panda Diplomacy introduces a point‑cloud self‑distillation framework that enables a single foundation‑model architecture and objective to be pre‑trained across three distinct particle‑detector modalities—liquid argon time‑projection chambers, collider TPCs, and water Cherenkov detectors—without extensive modification. Using only 1,000 labeled images for downstream adaptation, the resulting Panda V2 model matches or surpasses specialized baselines that require orders of magnitude more supervision, achieving state‑of‑the‑art particle‑clustering performance with 70× fewer labeled events on sPHENIX and up to 1,000× fewer labels on LArTPC data. Linear probes further demonstrate that the model’s latent space captures physically meaningful structures such as particle causality and track curvature.

By Samuel Young, C\'esar Jes\'us-Valls, Kazuhiro Terao
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Comparing Classical and Quantum Machine Learning for Regression in High Energy Physics Collision Data

The paper systematically compares four classical machine learning models—SVM, ANN, CNN, and LSTM—with their quantum equivalents—QSVM, QNN, QCNN, and QLSTM—on simulated proton‑proton collision data from CERN Open Data. Classical models, especially CNN and LSTM, slightly outperform the quantum models under current hardware and dataset constraints, but quantum models achieve comparable accuracy with far fewer trainable parameters; for example, the QCNN matches a deep classical CNN using only four qubits and a depth‑three circuit. The study also shows that the regression task is non‑trivial for shallow polynomial fits, underscoring the relevance of the architectural comparison. whyItMatters":"The work provides a realistic benchmark of classical versus quantum machine learning performance on high‑energy physics data, highlighting parameter‑efficiency advantages of quantum models for near‑term devices."

By Tariq Mahmood, Zain ul Abidin, Itzel Luviano Soto, Alfredo Raya
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

Lightweight Multi-Scale Anomaly Detection for Resource-Constrained Edge Devices

Time-series anomaly detection is increasingly important in IoT systems, sensor networks, and edge monitoring applications, where models must operate under strict constraints on memory, latency, and power consumption. While recent deep-learning approaches have improved detection accuracy, many remain computationally expensive and often fail to capture subtle anomalies due to limited multi-scale sensitivity.