This paper establishes a theoretical framework for vertical adaptive layer skipping, proving three foundational results: (i) an Expected FLOPs formula (theorem 2) giving a closed-form expression for t...
arXiv:2606. 01838v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic language model systems alternate between two structurally distinct step types: structured tool calls (short, deterministic, low perplexity) and open-ended planning/reasoning steps (long, complex, high perplexity).
By Prateek Kumar Sikdar
arXiv:2601. 21461v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern sparse language models typically achieve sparsity through Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) layers, which dynamically route tokens to dense MLP "experts.
By Albert Tseng, Christopher De Sa
arXiv:2606. 06574v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) perform inference by following a fixed depth and order, non-recurrent execution of all layers.
By Ziyue Li, Yang Li, Tianyi Zhou
arXiv:2502. 04411v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Model merging aggregates Large Language Models (LLMs) finetuned on different tasks into a stronger one.
By Kunfeng Lai, Zhenheng Tang, Xinglin Pan, Peijie Dong, Xiang Liu, Haolan Chen, Huacan Wang, Li Shen, Bo Li, Xiaowen Chu
arXiv:2512. 13996v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architectures are essential for scaling model capacity efficiently, yet the standard Top-$k$ routing imposes a rigid sparsity pattern that ignores the intrinsic variance in token difficulty and layer-specific computational needs.
By Can Jin, Hongwu Peng, Mingcan Xiang, Qixin Zhang, Xiangchi Yuan, Amit Hasan, Ohi Dibua, Yifan Gong, Yan Kang, Dimitris N. Metaxas
arXiv:2606. 09885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts large language models (LLMs) scale efficiently through sparse activation, yet their deployment is fundamentally constrained by the large static parameter footprint of experts.
By Jiangyang He, Shaolin Zhu, Deyi Xiong
The paper critiques the common practice of evaluating depth usage in depth‑recurrent language models by truncating depth during inference and measuring performance decline. It argues that this method conflates three distinct effects—fewer block applications, reduced computation, and an out‑of‑distribution readout—yet is usually interpreted as measuring only the second. To address this, the authors introduce the Depth Control Protocol (DCP), a suite of positive and negative controls that isolate each factor, along with a training intervention to confirm causality, specifically tailored for depth‑wise weight‑sharing architectures.
By Ha Van Dau, Thanh Tung Khuat, Nguyen Thanh Dung
arXiv:2608. 10605v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In large-scale pretraining, the algorithm, architecture, and systems decisions are conventionally made in disconnected stages.
By Soumajyoti Sarkar, Yuxin Tang, Sheng Zha
arXiv:2609.15992v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have rendered them necessary for Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, and their high inference cost...
By Foivos Charalampakos, Md Ibrahim Ibne Alam, Iordanis Koutsopoulos, Koushik Kar
As large language models (LLMs) scale rapidly, dense full-parameter adaptation becomes increasingly expensive, motivating sparse and modular architectures such as Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. This...
arXiv:2609.25655v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) scale rapidly, dense full-parameter adaptation becomes increasingly expensive, motivating sparse and modular architectu...
By Zhentao Tan, Chang Liu, Yao Liu, Yue Wu, Jieping Ye