arXiv AI

What Drives Representation Steering? A Mechanistic Case Study on Steering Refusal

The paper investigates how steering vectors influence large language models (LLMs) by conducting a mechanistic case study on refusal behavior. Using a multi-token activation patching framework, the authors find that steering methods primarily target the OV circuit of the attention mechanism, largely ignoring the QK circuit, and that these circuits are functionally interchangeable across different steering approaches. The study also shows that steering vectors can be sparsified by 85–96% with minimal performance loss and that key dimensions are consistently identified across methods.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

When is Your LLM Steerable?

arXiv:2606. 11599v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering offers a lightweight approach to control language models' behavior at inference time, but whether it succeeds or fails heavily depends on the prompt, concept, model, and steering configuration.

By Chenrui Fan, Yize Cheng, Ming Li, Soheil Feizi, Tianyi Zhou
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

When is Your LLM Steerable?

Activation steering offers a lightweight approach to control language models' behavior at inference time, but whether it succeeds or fails heavily depends on the prompt, concept, model, and steering configuration. Finding the regime and boundaries of successful steering typically requires expensive grid searches and post-hoc evaluation of full autoregressive rollouts.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

Language Models Can Control Their Own Attention

The paper introduces Declarative Attention (DA), a protocol that lets language models explicitly declare which parts of their context to focus on during generation. By partitioning decoding into full-context, region-specific, and recent-output-only modes, the inference engine can skip large portions of the KV cache, dramatically reducing attended tokens. Experiments on 15 long-context tasks with off-the-shelf models show significant savings (52.0% and 31.1% reductions) with only modest accuracy drops that diminish as model size increases.

By Namgyu Ho, Huzama Ahmad, Woosung Koh, Se-Young Yun, Tal Schuster, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos
arXiv AI
Sep 21

Decoupling Internal Representational Changes and Causal Importance in Fine-Tuned Large Language Models

Fine‑tuning reshapes internal representations of large language models, affecting attention patterns and layer‑wise activations. The study shows that components identified by EAP as important for task performance cluster in specific layers, yet these layers do not align with those undergoing the largest representational changes. Additionally, overlapping EAP components across different tasks do not guarantee cross‑task transfer and can even degrade performance when tasks differ in nature.

By Lingfang Li, Procheta Sen, Shubham Das, Danushka Bollegala
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Where Hallucinations Live: A Cross-Architecture Circuit in VQ-Tokenized Vision-Language Models

The paper investigates why vision‑language models that tokenize images with vector‑quantized (VQ) codebooks frequently hallucinate objects on grounded yes/no tasks. By applying activation patching across 25 models from eight large‑language‑model families, the authors uncover an early‑layer attention routing circuit shared by VQ‑tokenized VLMs. They develop a three‑gate diagnostic that isolates ten models carrying this circuit, show that swapping a single architectural component (VQ+Linear) introduces the circuit, and demonstrate that ablating the early‑layer ($L_0$) component reduces hallucinations in open‑ended generation by 31 % while other decoding‑time fixes do not.

By Shamanthak Hegde, Xiangrui Liu, Maitreya Patel, Yezhou Yang