arXiv:2606. 13361v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Right now, across the world, AI agents are repeating the same absurd act: to read one document, they each recompute it from scratch.
arXiv:2609.10266v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM serving systems already reuse KV caches, but only when the reused text sits at the very start of the prompt. Two growing workloads break this condi...
arXiv:2606. 01502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frontier LLMs increasingly decide what a query attends to with a sparse-attention indexer that picks a few KV-cache blocks per query: attention's unit is now a small, reusable chunk.
arXiv:2606. 01065v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern KV cache management assumes the chatbot workload: prompts arrive once and the cache grows append-only, so prefix caching and forward-only eviction are correct by construction.
arXiv:2608.30963v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern large language model (LLM) serving systems increasingly operate over repeated or shared context, yet each model typically performs its own pre...
arXiv:2608. 01247v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Query-agnostic KV cache eviction compresses a context once and reuses the resulting cache for arbitrary future queries, but performance can collapse under tight budgets.
The paper introduces an elastic key‑value (KV) cache for large language model (LLM) serving that dynamically reclaims a pre‑allocated reserve during decode‑heavy phases and restores it before prefill, using a userspace CUDA virtual‑memory trick that requires no driver changes. The authors implement this mechanism, test it under realistic workloads, and find that it offers only marginal benefits—about a 1 % difference in time‑to‑first‑token for large prefill chunks—and that simpler strategies such as lowering the maximum batch size can achieve similar results. The study also notes that the reserve’s impact diminishes with higher tensor‑parallelism levels. whyItMatters":"The work demonstrates that a dynamic KV cache reclamation strategy can be implemented without driver patches and that its practical benefits are limited, guiding future LLM serving optimizations toward simpler approaches."
arXiv:2609.32259v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly combine heterogeneous models for specialized agent roles. However, text-based communication requires ea...
arXiv:2608. 14624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems have emerged as an important deployment paradigm for AI services, where each user request is decomposed into a sequence of specialized agents.
arXiv:2606. 20474v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Context-heavy agents place unusual pressure on the key-value (KV) cache: long prefixes are reused across many short turns, while concurrency determines whether the serving system can keep GPUs utilized.
arXiv:2606. 17107v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prefix caching reuses prefill only across an exactly shared prefix, so one changed field invalidates the entire downstream cache.
The paper investigates how prefix caching, a default optimization in open‑source LLM serving stacks, affects reproducibility when combined with weight quantization. Experiments on an eighty‑episode multi‑turn agentic tool‑use workload show that enabling the cache causes the agent’s trajectory to change in 36.2 % of episodes at 16‑bit precision and 75.0 % at 4‑bit precision, while disabling the cache yields perfectly reproducible runs. The study identifies specific cache‑related settings that drive run‑to‑run divergence and demonstrates that cached serving is deterministic only when the cache state is preserved, which is not the case in typical deployments.
arXiv:2606. 13126v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented and agentic workloads repeatedly prefill recurring predictable structured inputs (which we call "spans") such as documents and code files.