arXiv:2602. 09303v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a physics-informed consistency modeling framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) via fast, few-step generative inference.
By Che-Chia Chang, Chen-Yang Dai, Te-Sheng Lin, Ming-Chih Lai, Chieh-Hsin Lai
arXiv:2605. 29283v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent physics foundation models claim general spatiotemporal forecasting ability, yet their evaluations often collapse performance into a single average score under a fixed training distribution.
By Mengdi Chu, Yang Liu, Ayan Biswas, Han-Wei Shen
arXiv:2607. 18187v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale scientific simulations generate volumetric data at rates that far outpace advances in storage and network bandwidth, making effective lossy compression increasingly critical.
By Kaiyuan Tang, Maizhe Yang, Chaoli Wang
arXiv:2509. 13805v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Foundation models have revolutionized natural language processing through a ``train once, deploy anywhere'' paradigm, where a single pre-trained model adapts to countless downstream tasks without retraining.
By Florian Wiesner, Zo\"e J. Gray, Matthias Wessling, Stephen Baek
arXiv:2604. 01313v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High-fidelity simulations and complex inverse problems, such as detector modeling and unfolding, are computationally intensive bottlenecks across subatomic physics, yet essential for accurate physical interpretation.
By Zeyu Xia, Tyler Kim, Trevor Reed, Judy Fox, Geoffrey Fox, Adam Szczepaniak
arXiv:2607. 23377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The largest machine learning models in particle physics are also the most expensive to train, yet the return on scaling a given architecture cannot be estimated before that compute is spent.
By Jan-Lucas Uslu, Benjamin Nachman, Christopher Re
arXiv:2606. 05389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lossy compression is essential for massive spatiotemporal data from scientific simulations.
By Liangji Zhu, Sanjay Ranka, Anand Rangarajan
The largest machine learning models in particle physics are also the most expensive to train, yet the return on scaling a given architecture cannot be estimated before that compute is spent. Scaling laws have been fit for jets, but none has yet been shown to predict the performance of models it was not fit on.
arXiv:2503.19081v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) aim to learn generalizable representations of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PD...
By Serge Kotchourko, Amin Totounferoush, Michael W. Mahoney, Steffen Staab
The paper introduces a method for selecting the best neural‑operator model during deployment without needing high‑fidelity reference solutions. By using a squared Hilbert‑space loss, the authors show that ranking a finite library of models depends only on the low‑dimensional span of candidate differences, enabling simultaneous scoring of all models with a single anchor‑based linearized response of the governing equation. This shared physical diagnostic accurately recovered over 99.6% of pairwise preferences and 99.0% of optimal checkpoints across diverse Fourier and convolutional operator libraries for fluid, reaction‑diffusion, and wave dynamics, and often outperformed the best individual candidates.
By Hanbing Liang, Fujun Liu
arXiv:2606. 19781v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural scaling laws describe how model performance improves as a power law in compute, model size, and dataset size.
By Jan-Lucas Uslu, Kevin Greif, Daniel Whiteson, Benjamin Nachman
arXiv:2606. 03279v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In AI for Science, physics-informed losses are increasingly used to train learned compressors for scientific data, but their rate-distortion implications remain poorly understood.
By Aleix Segui, Wesley Armour