Program evolution can measure whether a mutation helped, but it rarely controls how far the mutation moves in behavior space. Syntactic edit size is an unreliable proxy: a small code change can alter nearly every action, while a larger rewrite can preserve the same execution trace.
arXiv:2608. 05651v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-driven evolution has shown promise for program search and algorithm discovery, but relying on strong models throughout long evolutionary runs is costly.
By Sichun Luo, Yi Huang, Guanzhi Deng, Haibo Wang, Haochen Luo, Lei Li, Zefa Hu, Junlan Feng, Qi Liu
arXiv:2608. 17947v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models can generate executable programs, which makes it possible to search directly over procedural content generators rather than individual levels.
By Matthew Siper, Ahmed Khalifa, Julian Togelius
Successful mutation strategies in evolutionary code search may contain reusable knowledge that is useful beyond a single run, and in some cases may transfer across related tasks and domains. However, existing LLM-driven evolutionary frameworks largely discard such knowledge, repeatedly rediscovering similar ideas and limiting opportunities for cross-run and cross-task learning.
arXiv:2607. 28947v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to solve complex problems by searching over program space, offering a general paradigm for scientific problems that can be naturally represented and solved as programs.
By Jingwen Fu, Zhen Liu, Yuhan Liu, He Zhang, Nanning Zheng
Large language model (LLM)-driven evolution has shown promise for program search and algorithm discovery, but relying on strong models throughout long evolutionary runs is costly. A natural alternative is to combine cheap and strong models under a fixed inference budget.
arXiv:2606. 01286v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid progress of frontier large language models has led to widespread benchmark saturation, limiting the ability of existing datasets to differentiate model capabilities or provide useful training signal.
By Yangzhen Wu, Aaron J. Li, Wenjie Ma, Li Cao, Ziheng Zhou, Mert Cemri, Shu Liu, Yuran Xiu, Chenxiao Yan, Haikun Zhao, Bin Yu, Ion Stoica, Dawn Song
arXiv:2606. 16496v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large multimodal language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for guiding evolutionary search toward interpretable programmatic policies.
By Pan Wang
arXiv:2605. 29649v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Heuristic search is the dominant paradigm in symbolic AI planning, and the strongest heuristics are the result of decades of work by planning researchers.
By Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp
arXiv:2608. 10795v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Successful mutation strategies in evolutionary code search may contain reusable knowledge that is useful beyond a single run, and in some cases may transfer across related tasks and domains.
By Viktor Volkov, Valentin Khrulkov, Andrey V. Galichin, Danil Sivtsov, Nikita Glazkov, Olga Volkova, Konstantin Pchelin, Iaroslav Bespalov, Dmitry V. Dylov, Petr Anokhin, Ivan Oseledets
arXiv:2606. 26173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work shows that Large Language Models (LLMs) can act as semantic mutation operators for the evolutionary discovery of programs and proofs.
By Dhruv Sharma, Gautam Shroff
arXiv:2607. 02854v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Before fixing an issue, it is useful to first reproduce it by generating a bug reproduction test (BRT).
By Toufique Ahmed, Jatin Ganhotra, Avraham Shinnar, Martin Hirzel