Hugging Face Trending Papers

Toward Localizing and Repairing Bias in Transformer Attention Heads

Transformer language models are increasingly used as software components, yet biased outputs remain difficult to localize and repair inside the model. Existing fairness testing and repair methods largely operate at the input-output or retraining level, while recent work suggests that bias-related behavior can concentrate in a small set of attention heads.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7

Influence Score and Transformers interpretability: Measure of the Effective Impact of Attention Heads at inference time

The paper introduces an influence score that measures how much each attention head contributes to classification decisions in Transformer models, specifically for prompt injection detection. The score blends directional effects on logits with structural impact within the residual stream, allowing analysis at head, layer, and network scales. When applied to a DeBERTa model, the framework uncovers different decision patterns for correct versus incorrect predictions, offering a balanced approach between detailed circuit analysis and global output methods.

By Lisa Bouger, Yannick Teglia, Philippe Loubet Moundi
arXiv AI
Sep 2

BiasGym: A Simple and Generalizable Framework for Analyzing and Removing Biases through Injection

BiasGym is a cost‑effective, generalizable framework that injects specific biases into large language models via token‑based fine‑tuning while keeping the model frozen. It then uses two debiasing methods—Scope and Steer—to identify and suppress or redirect the components responsible for biased behavior. The framework enables consistent bias elicitation, precise localization of bias associations, and targeted debiasing without harming downstream performance, and it has been shown to reduce real‑world stereotypes such as labeling Italians as reckless drivers.

By Sekh Mainul Islam, Nadav Borenstein, Siddhesh Milind Pawar, Haeun Yu, Arnav Arora, Isabelle Augenstein
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 8

Attention Sink in Transformers: A Survey on Utilization, Interpretation, and Mitigation

arXiv:2604. 10098v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As the foundational architecture of modern machine learning, Transformers have driven remarkable progress across diverse AI domains.

By Zunhai Su, Hengyuan Zhang, Wei Wu, Yifan Zhang, Yaxiu Liu, He Xiao, Qingyao Yang, Yuxuan Sun, Rui Yang, Chao Zhang, Jing Xiong, Hui Shen, Keyu Fan, Weihao Ye, Chaofan Tao, Taiqiang Wu, Zhongwei Wan, Tiantian Zhang, Bowen Yan, Zhen Li, Yiming Zhang, Congkai Xie, Yulei Qian, Yuchen Xie, Yik-Chung Wu, Hongxia Yang, Ngai Wong
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

When Do Attention-Head Ablations Support Causal Claims? Projection-Level Confounds, Floor Effects, and Matched Controls

The paper investigates the reliability of attention‑head ablation as a causal inference tool in language models. Using GPT‑2 small, the authors find that a natural post‑projection zeroing method is almost uncorrelated with a corrected pre‑projection ablation and yields a completely different set of top‑5 important heads. They also show that binary accuracy can mask effects near performance floors or ceilings, whereas gold‑token log‑probability provides a graded signal. By employing a discovery/held‑out split and 1,000 matched random‑head and layer‑matched‑head controls, the corrected per‑head effect ranking remains highly stable (Spearman ρ = 0.974) and the top‑5 heads significantly outperform both control distributions (Monte Carlo p = 0.001). However, evidence for task specificity is weak on GPT‑2, and replication on DistilGPT‑2 confirms the intervention‑semantic and matched‑control findings.

By Juli Huang