arXiv Computation and Language

Hearing the Order: Investigating Position Bias in Large Audio-Language Models

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

On the Position Bias of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study

The paper investigates position bias in large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of model sizes—from billions to trillions of parameters—and across five languages. It finds that while small-scale models and non‑English languages still exhibit noticeable position bias, larger models and the use of Chain‑of‑Thought prompting substantially reduce this bias. Additionally, the study shows that emerging thinking models with advanced reasoning capabilities are almost immune to position bias, indicating a promising but resource‑intensive path to mitigating this vulnerability.

By Yining Li, Huayang Li, Lemao Liu, Taro Watanabe
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17

A Closer Look at Failure Modes in Temporal Understanding of Large Audio-Language Models

arXiv:2606. 17417v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) achieve strong performance on a variety of audio understanding tasks but continue to struggle with temporal reasoning, a fundamental capability central to human auditory perception.

By Apoorva Kulkarni, Kaousheik Jayakumar, Sreyan Ghosh, Sarah Wiegreffe, Dinesh Manocha, Ramani Duraiswami
arXiv AI
Oct 15

A, B, C, or Stable? Accuracy and Order Sensitivity Diverge in LLM Multiple-Choice Evaluation

The paper investigates whether accuracy and order sensitivity in large language model (LLM) multiple‑choice question (MCQ) evaluation move together. Using proprietary and open‑weight models on MMLU and ARC‑Challenge, the authors measure order sensitivity with flip rate and recall standard deviation (RStd) and find that these metrics often diverge from accuracy and from each other. They conclude that accuracy alone is insufficient and recommend reporting both flip rate and RStd alongside accuracy.

By Karl Hanna, Chen Feng
arXiv AI
Oct 12

DEAF: A Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness in Audio Language Models

DEAF (Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness) is a benchmark comprising over 2,700 conflict stimuli that test Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) across three acoustic dimensions: emotional prosody, background sounds, and speaker identity. The benchmark uses a controlled multi-level evaluation framework that gradually increases textual influence, from semantic conflicts to misleading prompts, to separate content-driven bias from prompt-induced sycophancy. Diagnostic metrics are introduced to measure how much models rely on textual cues versus acoustic signals, and an evaluation of seven Audio MLLMs shows that while models respond to acoustic variations, their predictions are largely driven by textual inputs, highlighting a gap between benchmark performance and true acoustic understanding.

By Jiaqi Xiong, Yunjia Qi, Qi Cao, Yu Zheng, Yutong Zhang, Ziteng Wang, Ruofan Liao, Weisheng Xu, Sichen Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 26

AU-Harness: An Open-Source Toolkit for Efficient and Unified Evaluation of AUdio-LLMs

AU-Harness is an open-source toolkit designed to streamline and standardize the evaluation of Audio Language Models (LALMs). It addresses three key limitations of existing frameworks: slow processing pipelines, lack of multi-turn dialogue support, and absence of a scalable, unified evaluation system. The toolkit achieves a 77% reduction in evaluation time, enabling large-scale studies and providing standardized protocols for fair model comparison and in-depth analysis of audio reasoning capabilities.

By Hoang Nguyen, Sidharth Surapaneni, Akshay Kalkunte, Jash Mehta, Aman Tiwari, Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Khyati Mahajan, Jash Shah, Shruthan Radhakrishna, Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan, Vikas Yadav, Sai Rajeswar