arXiv:2607. 15027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of AI-driven systems in creative work has sparked debates among artists and legal communities about notions of ownership.
arXiv:2607. 17940v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper frames Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) not as an unprecedented technological rupture, but as an industrial-scale manifestation of a deeply rooted historical process.
arXiv:2601. 15797v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many theorists maintain that conscious intentional agency is a necessary condition of creativity.
arXiv:2606. 26114v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We examine the structural transformation of creative industries under generative artificial intelligence, drawing on 374 primary sources spanning policy documents, industry data, creator surveys, and platform analytics.
arXiv:2607. 08331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how artworks are created requires reasoning about the iterative decisions, material operations, and contextual influences that shape artistic production.
Understanding how artworks are created requires reasoning about the iterative decisions, material operations, and contextual influences that shape artistic production. While recent generative AI systems can synthesize artworks with high fidelity, they primarily model distributions over finished artifacts rather than the creative processes underlying their creation.
arXiv:2608. 14405v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Art style is a signature of professional digital artists that develops through repeated experimentation, reflection, and adaptation.
arXiv:2607. 20796v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper examines the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems can be creative, approached from the dual perspective of a researcher trained in electrical engineering, pattern recognition, machine learning, and neural networks, who has also spent most of his life engaged in the arts as actor, stage and film director, writer, composer, and visual artist, and in philosophy.
arXiv:2607. 28644v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Creativity in computational systems is often evaluated as an objective property of artifacts, with existing Computational Creativity (CC) frameworks assessing creative merit at the level of outputs or systems rather than interpretive context.
arXiv:2606. 30561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern AI evaluation frameworks treat evaluator disagreement as noise to be resolved.
arXiv:2606. 05532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent studies reveal a paradox: AI enhances individual creative outputs while reducing collective diversity.
Generative AI tools for creative work tend to be designed around the goal of removing friction, on the assumption that smoother iteration and faster output translate into more value for the designer. We argue, however, that this framing leaves out something important about how design ideation works, namely reflection-in-action.
arXiv:2608. 13944v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper examines a use of AI in creative practice as an interpretive sounding board for human-generated material, rather than the more familiar pattern of AI generation followed by human curation.